• ȨÆäÀÌÁö
    ¿µ¾î
    Áß±¹¾î
    »çÀÌÆ®Áöµµ
    JOIN
  • Username (Site Login ID)
  • Password
  • Forgot your password?

  • Cases & Studies in Internet Gambling

    date : 2015-05-20 01:10|hit : 391
    Article] Neural Response to Reward Anticipation under Risk Is Nonlinear in Probabilities
    DocNo of ILP: 3382

    Doc. Type: Article

    Title: Neural Response to Reward Anticipation under Risk Is Nonlinear in Probabilities

    Authors: Hsu, M; Krajbich, I; Zhao, C; Camerer, CF

    Full Name of Authors: Hsu, Ming; Krajbich, Ian; Zhao, Chen; Camerer, Colin F.

    Keywords by Author: probability weighting; prospect theory; expected utility theory; fMRI; decision making; reward

    Keywords Plus: WEIGHTING FUNCTION; DECISION-MAKING; PROSPECT-THEORY; UTILITY-THEORY; HUMAN BRAIN; UNCERTAINTY; PREDICTION; JUDGMENTS; NUCLEUS; SYSTEMS

    Abstract: A widely observed phenomenon in decision making under risk is the apparent overweighting of unlikely events and the underweighting of nearly certain events. This violates standard assumptions in expected utility theory, which requires that expected utility be linear (objective) in probabilities. Models such as prospect theory have relaxed this assumption and introduced the notion of a "probability weighting function," which captures the key properties found in experimental data. This study reports functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) data that neural response to expected reward is nonlinear in probabilities. Specifically, we found that activity in the striatum during valuation of monetary gambles are nonlinear in probabilities in the pattern predicted by prospect theory, suggesting that probability distortion is reflected at the level of the reward encoding process. The degree of nonlinearity reflected in individual subjects' decisions is also correlated with striatal activity across subjects. Our results shed light on the neural mechanisms of reward processing, and have implications for future neuroscientific studies of decision making involving extreme tails of the distribution, where probability weighting provides an explanation for commonly observed behavioral anomalies.

    Cate of OECD: Basic medicine

    Year of Publication: 2009

    Business Area: gamble

    Detail Business: gamble

    Country: USA

    Study Area:

    Name of Journal: JOURNAL OF NEUROSCIENCE

    Language: English

    Country of Authors: [Krajbich, Ian; Camerer, Colin F.] CALTECH, Div Humanities & Social Sci, Pasadena, CA 91125 USA; [Hsu, Ming] Univ Illinois, Beckman Inst Adv Sci & Technol, Urbana, IL 61801 USA; [Hsu, Ming] Univ Illinois, Dept Econ, Urbana, IL 61801 USA; [Zhao, Chen] MIT, Cambridge, MA 02139 USA

    Press Adress: Camerer, CF (reprint author), CALTECH, Div Humanities & Social Sci, Pasadena, CA 91125 USA.

    Email Address: camerer@hss.caltech.edu

    Citaion:

    Funding: Gordon and Betty Moore Foundation; Human Frontier Science Program grant

    Lists of Citation: Abler B, 2006, NEUROIMAGE, V31, P790, DOI 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2006.01.001; Allais M, 1953, ECONOMETRICA, V21, P503, DOI 10.2307/1907921; Barberis N, 2008, AM ECON REV, V98, P2066, DOI 10.1257/aer.98.5.2066; Berns GS, 2008, NEUROIMAGE, V39, P2047, DOI 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2007.10.028; CAMERER CF, 1994, J RISK UNCERTAINTY, V8, P167, DOI 10.1007/BF01065371; De Martino B, 2006, SCIENCE, V313, P684, DOI 10.1126/science.1128356; FOX CH, 2006, MICROBE, V1, P159; Fox CR, 2008, NEUROECONOMICS DECIS, P145; Friston K. J., 1995, HUMAN BRAIN MAPPING, V2, P189, DOI [10.1002/hbm.460020402, DOI 10.1002/HBM.460020402]; Wu G, 1996, MANAGE SCI, V42, P1676, DOI 10.1287/mnsc.42.12.1676; Haruno M, 2006, J NEUROPHYSIOL, V95, P948, DOI 10.1152/jn.00382.2005; Hertwig R, 2004, PSYCHOL SCI, V15, P534, DOI 10.1111/j.0956-7976.2004.00715.x; Hollands JG, 2000, PSYCHOL REV, V107, P500, DOI 10.1037/0033-295X.107.3.500; Huettel SA, 2006, NEURON, V49, P765, DOI 10.1016/j.neuron.2006.01.024; Kagel J. H., 1995, EC CHOICE THEORY EXP; KAHNEMAN D, 1979, ECONOMETRICA, V47, P263, DOI 10.2307/1914185; Kilka M, 2001, MANAGE SCI, V47, P1712, DOI 10.1287/mnsc.47.12.1712.10239; Knutson B, 2000, NEUROIMAGE, V12, P20, DOI 10.1006/nimg.2000.0593; Knutson B., 2001, J NEUROSCI, V21; Montague PR, 2004, NATURE, V431, P760, DOI 10.1038/nature03015; MORGENSTERN O, 1979, EXPECTED UTILITY HYP, P175; O'Doherty J, 2004, SCIENCE, V304, P452, DOI 10.1126/science.1094285; Paulus MP, 2006, NEUROIMAGE, V30, P668, DOI 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2005.09.061; Prelec D, 1998, ECONOMETRICA, V66, P497, DOI 10.2307/2998573; PRESTON MG, 1948, AM J PSYCHOL, V61, P183, DOI 10.2307/1416964; Preuschoff K, 2006, NEURON, V51, P381, DOI 10.1016/j.neuron.2006.06.024; Robson AJ, 2002, J ECON PERSPECT, V16, P89, DOI 10.1257/0895330027274; RUBINSTEIN A, 1988, J ECON THEORY, V46, P145, DOI 10.1016/0022-0531(88)90154-8; Savage L., 1954, FDN STAT; Schultz W, 2000, NAT REV NEUROSCI, V1, P199, DOI 10.1038/35044563; Starmer C, 2000, J ECON LIT, V38, P332, DOI 10.1257/jel.38.2.332; Tobler PN, 2007, J NEUROPHYSIOL, V97, P1621, DOI 10.1152/jn.00745.2006; Tom SM, 2007, SCIENCE, V315, P515, DOI 10.1126/science.1134239; TVERSKY A, 1992, J RISK UNCERTAINTY, V5, P297, DOI 10.1007/BF00122574; VAREY CA, 1990, J EXP PSYCHOL HUMAN, V16, P613, DOI 10.1037/0096-1523.16.3.613; Yacubian J, 2006, J NEUROSCI, V26, P9530, DOI 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2915-06.2006

    Number of Citaion: 36

    Publication: SOC NEUROSCIENCE

    City of Publication: WASHINGTON

    Address of Publication: 11 DUPONT CIRCLE, NW, STE 500, WASHINGTON, DC 20036 USA

    ISSN: 0270-6474

    29-Character Source Abbreviation: J NEUROSCI

    ISO Source Abbreviation: J. Neurosci.

    Volume: 29

    Version: 7

    Start of File: 2231

    End of File: 2237

    DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.5296-08.2009

    Number of Pages: 7

    Web of Science Category: Neurosciences

    Subject Category: Neurosciences & Neurology

    Document Delivery Number: 410EA

    Unique Article Identifier: WOS:000263558900027

    [ÀÌ °Ô½Ã¹°Àº HyeJung Mo¡¦´Ô¿¡ ÀÇÇØ 2015-05-20 14:44:04 GAMBLING¿¡¼­ À̵¿ µÊ]
    reply : 0
  • list
  • prev
  • next