• HOME
    KOREAN
    CHINESS
    SITE MAP
    JOIN
  • Username (Site Login ID)
  • Password
  • Forgot your password?

  • ÀÎÅͳݰ׺í | Cases & Studies in Internet Gambling | 网ß¾赌ÚÏ

    date : 2015-05-20 01:10|hit : 2633
    Article] Dopamine D-1 Receptors and Nonlinear Probability Weighting in Risky Choice
    DocNo of ILP: 2337

    Doc. Type: Article

    Title: Dopamine D-1 Receptors and Nonlinear Probability Weighting in Risky Choice

    Authors: Takahashi, H; Matsui, H; Camerer, C; Takano, H; Kodaka, F; Ideno, T; Okubo, S; Takemura, K; Arakawa, R; Eguchi, Y; Murai, T; Okubo, Y; Kato, M; Ito, H; Suhara, T

    Full Name of Authors: Takahashi, Hidehiko; Matsui, Hiroshi; Camerer, Colin; Takano, Harumasa; Kodaka, Fumitoshi; Ideno, Takashi; Okubo, Shigetaka; Takemura, Kazuhisa; Arakawa, Ryosuke; Eguchi, Yoko; Murai, Toshiya; Okubo, Yoshiro; Kato, Motoichiro; Ito, Hiroshi; Suhara, Tetsuya

    Keywords by Author:

    Keywords Plus: POSITRON-EMISSION-TOMOGRAPHY; DECISION-MAKING; HUMAN BRAIN; C-11 RACLOPRIDE; NOVELTY SEEKING; PROSPECT-THEORY; NEURAL BASIS; PET; BINDING; RELEASE

    Abstract: Misestimating risk could lead to disadvantaged choices such as initiation of drug use (or gambling) and transition to regular drug use (or gambling). Although the normative theory in decision-making under risks assumes that people typically take the probability-weighted expectation over possible utilities, experimental studies of choices among risks suggest that outcome probabilities are transformed nonlinearly into subjective decision weights by a nonlinear weighting function that overweights low probabilities and underweights high probabilities. Recent studies have revealed the neurocognitive mechanism of decision-making under risk. However, the role of modulatory neurotransmission in this process remains unclear. Using positron emission tomography, we directly investigated whether dopamine D-1 and D-2 receptors in the brain are associated with transformation of probabilities into decision weights in healthy volunteers. The binding of striatal D-1 receptors is negatively correlated with the degree of nonlinearity of weighting function. Individuals with lower striatal D-1 receptor density showed more pronounced overestimation of low probabilities and underestimation of high probabilities. This finding should contribute to a better understanding of the molecular mechanism of risky choice, and extreme or impaired decision-making observed in drug and gambling addiction.

    Cate of OECD: Basic medicine

    Year of Publication: 2010

    Business Area: gamble

    Detail Business: gamble

    Country: USA

    Study Area:

    Name of Journal: JOURNAL OF NEUROSCIENCE

    Language: English

    Country of Authors: [Takahashi, Hidehiko] Kyoto Univ, Grad Sch Med, Dept Psychiat, Sakyo Ku, Kyoto 6068507, Japan; [Takahashi, Hidehiko; Matsui, Hiroshi; Takano, Harumasa; Kodaka, Fumitoshi; Arakawa, Ryosuke; Eguchi, Yoko; Ito, Hiroshi; Suhara, Tetsuya] Natl Inst Radiol Sci, Dept Mol Neuroimaging, Mol Imaging Ctr, Chiba 2638555, Japan; [Takahashi, Hidehiko] Japan Sci & Technol Agcy, Precursory Res Embryon Sci & Technol PRESTO, Saitama 3320012, Japan; [Takahashi, Hidehiko] Tamagawa Univ, Brain Sci Inst, Tokyo 1948610, Japan; [Camerer, Colin] CALTECH, Div Humanities & Social Sci, Pasadena, CA 91125 USA; [Ideno, Takashi; Okubo, Shigetaka; Takemura, Kazuhisa] Waseda Univ, Dept Psychol, Tokyo 1628644, Japan; [Okubo, Yoshiro] Nippon Med Sch, Dept Neuropsychiat, Tokyo 1138603, Japan; [Kato, Motoichiro] Keio Univ, Sch Med, Dept Neuropsychiat, Tokyo 1608582, Japan

    Press Adress: Takahashi, H (reprint author), Kyoto Univ, Grad Sch Med, Dept Psychiat, Sakyo Ku, 54 Shogoin Kawara Cho, Kyoto 6068507, Japan.

    Email Address: hidehiko@kuhp.kyoto-u.ac.jp

    Citaion:

    Funding: Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology (MEXT)

    Lists of Citation: Aalto S, 2005, J NEUROSCI, V25, P2471, DOI 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2097-04.2005; Berns GS, 2008, NEUROIMAGE, V39, P2047, DOI 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2007.10.028; Camerer CF, 2004, ROUNDTABLE SER BEHAV, P3; Comings DE, 1997, MOL PSYCHIATR, V2, P44, DOI 10.1038/sj.mp.4000207; Cools R, 2008, TRENDS COGN SCI, V12, P31, DOI 10.1016/j.tics.2007.10.01; De Martino B, 2006, SCIENCE, V313, P684, DOI 10.1126/science.1128356; Doya K, 2008, NAT NEUROSCI, V11, P410, DOI 10.1038/nn2077; Ekelund J, 2007, MOL IMAGING BIOL, V9, P117, DOI 10.1007/s11307-007-0077-4; FARDE L, 1987, PSYCHOPHARMACOLOGY, V92, P278, DOI 10.1007/BF00210831; Fox CR, 2009, NEUROECONOMICS: DECISION MAKING AND THE BRAIN, P145, DOI 10.1016/B978-0-12-374176-9.00011-7; Frank MJ, 2007, PHILOS T R SOC B, V362, P1641, DOI 10.1098/rstb.2007.2058; Wu G, 1996, MANAGE SCI, V42, P1676, DOI 10.1287/mnsc.42.12.1676; GRACE AA, 1991, NEUROSCIENCE, V41, P1, DOI 10.1016/0306-4522(91)90196-U; Gunn RN, 1997, NEUROIMAGE, V6, P279, DOI 10.1006/nimg.1997.0303; Hirvonen J, 2001, J CEREBR BLOOD F MET, V21, P1146; Hsu M, 2009, J NEUROSCI, V29, P2231, DOI 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.5296-08.2009; Innis RB, 2007, J CEREBR BLOOD F MET, V27, P1533, DOI 10.1038/sj.jcbfm.9600493; Ito H, 2008, NEUROIMAGE, V39, P555, DOI 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2007.09.011; Kelley AE, 2004, ANN NY ACAD SCI, V1021, P27, DOI 10.1196/annals.1308.003; Kreek MJ, 2005, NAT NEUROSCI, V8, P1450, DOI 10.1038/nn1583; Kuhnen CM, 2005, NEURON, V47, P763, DOI 10.1016/j.neuron.2005.08.008; Lammertsma AA, 1996, NEUROIMAGE, V4, P153, DOI 10.1006/nimg.1996.0066; LATTIMORE PK, 1992, J ECON BEHAV ORGAN, V17, P377, DOI 10.1016/S0167-2681(95)90015-2; Leyton M, 2002, NEUROPSYCHOPHARMACOL, V27, P1027, DOI 10.1016/S0893-133X(02)00366-4; Martinez D, 2009, NEUROPSYCHOPHARMACOL, V34, P1774, DOI 10.1038/npp.2008.235; Mawlawi O, 2001, J CEREBR BLOOD F MET, V21, P1034; McNab F, 2009, SCIENCE, V323, P800, DOI 10.1126/science.1166102; Olsson H, 1999, J CEREBR BLOOD F MET, V19, P1164; Paulus MP, 2006, NEUROIMAGE, V30, P668, DOI 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2005.09.061; Pessiglione M, 2006, NATURE, V442, P1042, DOI 10.1038/nature05051; Prelec D, 1998, ECONOMETRICA, V66, P497, DOI 10.2307/2998573; Rangel A, 2008, NAT REV NEUROSCI, V9, P545, DOI 10.1038/nrn2357; Rottenstreich Y, 2001, PSYCHOL SCI, V12, P185, DOI 10.1111/1467-9280.00334; Schultz W, 2007, TRENDS NEUROSCI, V30, P203, DOI 10.1016/j.tins.2007.03.007; Steeves TDL, 2009, BRAIN, V132, P1376, DOI 10.1093/brain/awp054; St Onge JR, 2009, NEUROPSYCHOPHARMACOL, V34, P681, DOI 10.1038/npp.2008.121; Sudo Y, 2001, NUCL MED COMMUN, V22, P1215, DOI 10.1097/00006231-200111000-00008; Suhara T, 1999, INT J NEUROPSYCHOP, V2, P73, DOI 10.1017/S1461145799001431; Takahashi H, 2008, J NEUROSCI, V28, P12032, DOI 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3446-08.2008; Takahashi H, 2010, J NEUROSCI, V30, P3043, DOI 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.5689-09.2010; Tamminga CA, 2006, AM J PSYCHIAT, V163, P180, DOI 10.1176/appi.ajp.163.2.180; Tom SM, 2007, SCIENCE, V315, P515, DOI 10.1126/science.1134239; Trepel C, 2005, COGNITIVE BRAIN RES, V23, P34, DOI 10.1016/j.cogbrainres.2005.01.016; TVERSKY A, 1992, J RISK UNCERTAINTY, V5, P297, DOI 10.1007/BF00122574; VOLKOW ND, 1993, J NUCL MED, V34, pP67; von Neumann J., 1944, THEORY GAMES EC BEHA; Voon V, 2010, NEURON, V65, P135, DOI 10.1016/j.neuron.2009.12.027; Wittmann BC, 2008, NEURON, V58, P967, DOI 10.1016/j.neuron.2008.04.027; Zack M, 2004, NEUROPSYCHOPHARMACOL, V29, P195, DOI 10.1038/sj.npp.1300333

    Number of Citaion: 49

    Publication: SOC NEUROSCIENCE

    City of Publication: WASHINGTON

    Address of Publication: 11 DUPONT CIRCLE, NW, STE 500, WASHINGTON, DC 20036 USA

    ISSN: 0270-6474

    29-Character Source Abbreviation: J NEUROSCI

    ISO Source Abbreviation: J. Neurosci.

    Volume: 30

    Version: 49

    Start of File: 16567

    End of File: 16572

    DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3933-10.2010

    Number of Pages: 6

    Web of Science Category: Neurosciences

    Subject Category: Neurosciences & Neurology

    Document Delivery Number: 691NW

    Unique Article Identifier: WOS:000285089100018

    [ÀÌ °Ô½Ã¹°Àº HyeJung Mo¡¦´Ô¿¡ ÀÇÇØ 2015-05-20 14:44:04 GAMBLING¿¡¼­ À̵¿ µÊ]
    reply : 0
  • list
  • prev
  • next