• HOME
    KOREAN
    CHINESS
    SITE MAP
    JOIN
  • Username (Site Login ID)
  • Password
  • Forgot your password?

  • ÇÐÁ¦°£¿¬±¸ | Interdisciplinary Studies in Gambling | Î¥学Ρ研ϼ

    date : 2015-05-20 01:10|hit : 1623
    Article] Dyslipidaemia among renal transplant recipients: cyclosporine versus tacrolimus
    DocNo of ILP: 33

    Doc. Type: Article

    Title: Dyslipidaemia among renal transplant recipients: cyclosporine versus tacrolimus

    Authors: Fazal, MA; Idrees, MK; Akhtar, SF

    Full Name of Authors: Fazal, Muhammad Asim; Idrees, Muhammad Khalid; Akhtar, Syed Fazal

    Keywords by Author: Dyslipidaemia; Cyclosporine; Tacrolimus; Renal transplant; Lipid

    Keywords Plus: KIDNEY-TRANSPLANTATION; RISK-FACTORS; FOLLOW-UP; 1ST YEAR; INHIBITORS; CONVERSION; MORTALITY; DIALYSIS; THERAPY

    Abstract: Objectives: To compare new onset dyslipidaemia in live-related renal transplant recipients taking cyclosporine versus tacrolimus after 3 months of therapy. Methods: The randomised controlled trial was conducted at the Sindh Institute of Urology and Transplantation (SIUT) Karachi, from September 2010 to April 2011, and included 182 End Stage Renal Disease patients on maintenance haemodialysis with pre-transplant normal lipid profile. The patients, who had live-related renal transplant, were randomly allocated to two equal groups using lottery. Group A received cyclosporine (3mg/kg) and group B was treated with tacrolimus (0.1mg/kg). All patients had pre-transplant fasting lipid profile checked when they were on maintenance haemodialysis and 3 months after renal transplantation. Serum fasting lipid profile was collected by taking 5ml blood by venipuncture after an overnight fast of 9-12 hours. SPSS 10 was used for statistical analyses. Results: Of the 182 patients, 144(79.1%) were males and 38(20.9%) were females. The overall mean age was 30.18 +/- 9.57 years, and the mean weight was 54.41 +/- 11.144kg. Significant difference was not observed between the two groups regarding age and weight of the patients. Dyslipidaemia was found in 115(63.2%) subjects; 61(67%) in group A and 54(59.3%) in group B. There was no statistical difference (p=0.28) when comparison was done after 3 months of therapy. Conclusions: The occurrence of new onset hyperlipidaemia is similar in renal transplant recipients receiving either cyclosporine or tacrolimus in first 3 months post-transplant, but there is room for more research in this field as dyslipidaemia following successful renal transplantation is a frequent and persistent complication.

    Cate of OECD: Clinical medicine

    Year of Publication: 2014

    Business Area: lottery

    Detail Business: lottery

    Country: Pakistan

    Study Area:

    Name of Journal: JOURNAL OF THE PAKISTAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION

    Language: English

    Country of Authors: [Fazal, Muhammad Asim; Idrees, Muhammad Khalid; Akhtar, Syed Fazal] Sindh Inst Urol & Transplantat, Dept Nephrol, Karachi, Pakistan

    Press Adress: Idrees, MK (reprint author), Sindh Inst Urol & Transplantat, Dept Nephrol, Karachi, Pakistan.

    Email Address: drkhalid37@gmail.com

    Citaion:

    Funding:

    Lists of Citation: CIFTCI HS, 2012, IND J CLIN BIOCH, V28, P164; Claes K, 2012, NEPHROL DIAL TRANSPL, V27, P850, DOI 10.1093/ndt/gfr238; Collins AJ, 2009, CLIN J AM SOC NEPHRO, V4, pS5, DOI 10.2215/CJN.05980809; Dumler F, 2007, J RENAL NUTR, V17, P97, DOI 10.1053/j.jrn.2006.10.017; Ghisdal L, 2008, TRANSPL INT, V21, P146, DOI 10.1111/j.1432-2277.2007.00589.x; GHNAIMAT M, 2006, JRMS, V13, P10; KAHAN BD, 1989, NEW ENGL J MED, V321, P1725; Kanbay M, 2006, TRANSPLANT P, V38, P502, DOI 10.1016/j.transproceed.2005.12.052; Kramer BK, 2005, NEPHROL DIAL TRANSPL, V20, P968, DOI 10.1093/ndt/gfh739; Ligtenberg G, 2001, J AM SOC NEPHROL, V12, P368; MOHAMMAD HF, 2012, GLOBAL J MED RES, V12, P5; NAVANEETHAN SD, 2009, COCHRANE DB SYST REV, V15, P5019; Neipp M, 2006, TRANSPLANTATION, V81, P1640, DOI 10.1097/01.tp.0000226070.74443.fb; OJHA JP, 2012, CLIN QUERIES NEPHROL, V1, P191; *OPTN, 2011, OPTN SRTR 2010 ANN D; Perrea DN, 2008, INT UROL NEPHROL, V40, P521, DOI 10.1007/s11255-007-9266-y; POURMAND G, 2010, INT J ORG TRANSPLANT, V1, P131; Prakash J, 2012, Indian J Nephrol, V22, P264, DOI 10.4103/0971-4065.101245; Rabbat CG, 2000, J AM SOC NEPHROL, V11, P917; Razeghi E, 2011, EXP CLIN TRANSPLANT, V9, P230; Rizvi SAH, 2010, CLIN NEPHROL, V74, pS142; Rostaing L, 2010, J NEPHROL, V23, P133; Rostaing L, 2012, TRANSPL INT, V25, P391, DOI 10.1111/j.1432-2277.2011.01409.x; Spinelli GA, 2011, TRANSPL P, V43, P3730, DOI 10.1016/j.transproceed.2011.08.074; Younas N, 2010, BMC NEPHROL, V11, DOI 10.1186/1471-2369-11-5

    Number of Citaion: 25

    Publication: PAKISTAN MEDICAL ASSOC

    City of Publication: KARACHI

    Address of Publication: PMA HOUSE, AGA KHAN III RD, KARACHI, 00000, PAKISTAN

    ISSN: 0030-9982

    29-Character Source Abbreviation: J PAK MED ASSOC

    ISO Source Abbreviation: J. Pak. Med. Assoc.

    Volume: 64

    Version: 5

    Start of File: 496

    End of File: 499

    DOI:

    Number of Pages: 4

    Web of Science Category: Medicine, General & Internal; Medicine, Research & Experimental

    Subject Category: General & Internal Medicine; Research & Experimental Medicine

    Document Delivery Number: AF0GT

    Unique Article Identifier: WOS:000334393000003

    reply : 0
  • list
  • prev
  • next