학제간연구 | Interdisciplinary Studies in Gambling | 跨学科研究
- date : 2015-05-20 01:10|hit : 1415
-
- Article] Application of generalizability theory confirmed lower reliability of the standard gamble than the feeling thermometer
-
DocNo of ILP: 4048
Doc. Type: Article
Title: Application of generalizability theory confirmed lower reliability of the standard gamble than the feeling thermometer
Authors: Schunemann, HJ; Norman, G; Puhan, MA; Stahl, E; Griffith, L; Heels-Ansdell, D; Montori, VM; Wiklund, I; Goldstein, R; Mador, MJ; Guyatt, GH
Full Name of Authors: Schuenemann, Holger J.; Norman, Geoff; Puhan, Milo A.; Stahl, Elisabeth; Griffith, Lauren; Heels-Ansdell, Diane; Montori, Victor M.; Wiklund, Ingela; Goldstein, Roger; Mador, M. Jeffery; Guyatt, Gordon H.
Keywords by Author: preference-based instruments; standard gamble; visual analogue scale; utilities; reliability
Keywords Plus: RANDOMIZED MULTICENTER TRIAL; QUALITY-OF-LIFE; MARKER STATES; EVALUATE; DISEASE; PREFERENCES
Abstract: Objectives: Recent studies suggest that rating clinical marker states (CMS) does not improve the measurement properties of the standard gamble (SG) and only slightly improves those of the feeling thermometer (FT). The poor intrarater (test-retest) reliability of CMS may explain their meager performance. Further, lack of interrater reliability may compromise the use of CMS in interpreting health state ratings. The aim of this study was to assess the reliability of CMS ratings for the SG and the FT. Study Design and Setting: Two similar studies in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD, n = 91) and in patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD, n = 112) provided data for this analysis. Patients rated three different CMS (mild, moderate, and severe disease) twice several weeks apart. We used generalizability theory to calculate reliability coefficients. Results: Test-retest reliability for CMS ratings was higher for the FT compared to the SG (COPD: 0.86 vs. 0.67; GERD: 0.86 vs. 0.67). Interrater reliability was much higher for the IT compared to the SG (COPD: 0.78 vs. 0.46; GERD: 0.71 vs. 0.26). Conclusions: These results suggest that the markedly poorer reliability of CMS for the SG than the FT is driven largely by poor interrater reliability. (C) 2007 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Cate of OECD: Health sciences
Year of Publication: 2007
Business Area: gamble
Detail Business: gamble
Country: England
Study Area: culture, quality of life, Standardization, theoretical study, theoretical study, software, application, patient, preference, disease
Name of Journal: JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY
Language: English
Country of Authors: Italian Natl Canc Inst Regina Elena, CLARITY Res Grp, INFORMA Unit, Dept Epidemiol, I-00144 Rome, Italy; McMaster Univ, Dept Clin Epidemiol & Biostat, Hamilton, ON, Canada; McMaster Univ, Dept Psychol, Hamilton, ON, Canada; Univ Zurich, Horten Ctr, Zurich, Switzerland; AstraZeneca R&D, Lund, Sweden; Mayo Clin, Coll Med, Knowledge & Encounter Res Unit, Rochester, MN USA; GlaxoSmithKline Inc, Global Hlth Outcomes, Greenford, Middx, England; Univ Toronto, Dept Med, Toronto, ON, Canada; McMaster Univ, Dept Med, Hamilton, ON, Canada
Press Adress: Schunemann, HJ (reprint author), Italian Natl Canc Inst Regina Elena, CLARITY Res Grp, INFORMA Unit, Dept Epidemiol, Via Elio Chianesi 53, I-00144 Rome, Italy.
Email Address: schuneh@mcmaster.ca
Citaion:
Funding:
Lists of Citation: BENNET KJ, 1996, MEASURING HLTH STATE, P259; BENNETT K, 1991, CONTROLLED CLIN TR S, V12, P118; CRONBACH LJ, 1963, BRIT J STATIST PSYCH, V16, P137; Cronbach L. J., 1972, DEPENDABILITY BEHAV; Drummond MF, 1997, METHODS EC EVALUATIO; Feeny D, 2002, MED CARE, V40, P113, DOI 10.1097/00005650-200202000-00006; FROBERG DG, 1989, J CLIN EPIDEMIOL, V42, P585, DOI 10.1016/0895-4356(89)90155-8; Jones CA, 2005, INT J TECHNOL ASSESS, V21, P393; Juniper EF, 2002, ALLERGY, V57, P201, DOI 10.1034/j.1398-9995.2002.1o3306.x; Lenert LA, 1999, MED DECIS MAKING, V19, P473, DOI 10.1177/0272989X9901900415; Mathias SD, 2000, CLIN THER, V22, P128, DOI 10.1016/S0149-2918(00)87984-9; MOHIDE EA, 1988, J CLIN EPIDEMIOL, V41, P475, DOI 10.1016/0895-4356(88)90049-2; Puhan MA, 2005, J CLIN EPIDEMIOL, V58, P458, DOI 10.1016/j.clinepi.2004.07.010; Schunemann HJ, 2004, MED CARE, V42, P1132; Schunemann HJ, 2005, EUR RESPIR J, V25, P31, DOI 10.1183/09031936.04.00029704; Schunemann HJ, 2004, MED DECIS MAKING, V24, P53, DOI 10.1177/0272989X03261566; Schunemann HJ, 2006, QUAL LIFE RES, V15, P1, DOI 10.1007/s11136-005-0126-x; Schunemann HJ, 2003, MED DECIS MAKING, V23, P140, DOI 10.1177/0272989X03251243; Spearman C, 1904, AM J PSYCHOL, V15, P72, DOI 10.2307/1412159; Streiner D. L., 2003, HLTH MEASUREMENT SCA; STREINER DL, 2003, GENERALIZABILITY THE, P153
Number of Citaion: 21
Publication: PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
City of Publication: OXFORD
Address of Publication: THE BOULEVARD, LANGFORD LANE, KIDLINGTON, OXFORD OX5 1GB, ENGLAND
ISSN: 0895-4356
29-Character Source Abbreviation: J CLIN EPIDEMIOL
ISO Source Abbreviation: J. Clin. Epidemiol.
Volume: 60
Version: 12
Start of File: 1256
End of File: 1262
DOI: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2007.03.010
Number of Pages: 7
Web of Science Category: Public, Environmental & Occupational Health
Subject Category: Public, Environmental & Occupational Health
Document Delivery Number: 238RY
Unique Article Identifier: WOS:000251466500008
- reply : 0
-
- list
-
- prev
- next