• HOME
    KOREAN
    CHINESS
    SITE MAP
    JOIN
  • Username (Site Login ID)
  • Password
  • Forgot your password?

  • ÇÐÁ¦°£¿¬±¸ | Interdisciplinary Studies in Gambling | Î¥学Ρ研ϼ

    date : 2015-05-20 01:10|hit : 1391
    Article] The future of outcomes measurement in rheumatology
    DocNo of ILP: 4038

    Doc. Type: Article

    Title: The future of outcomes measurement in rheumatology

    Authors: Kaplan, RM

    Full Name of Authors: Kaplan, Robert M.

    Keywords by Author:

    Keywords Plus: ADJUSTED LIFE YEARS; HEALTH-STATUS; STATUS INDEX; ARTHRITIS; QUALITY; SF-36; VALIDATION; VALIDITY; SERVICES; DISEASE

    Abstract: Quality-of-life (QOL) measurement has a rich history in rheurnatology, and although the study of health measurements has expanded remarkably in recent years, there are a number of methodological issues that need attention. This article focuses on utility-based measures that are most relevant to public policy and some major issues that remain unresolved. The duration of a health condition, for example, is a central component of health outcome. However, the majority of measures currently used in rheurnatology do not consider the duration of condition or the long-term consequences of disease or treatment. Similarly, there are many levels at which preference is expressed in the healthcare decision process, and despite a wealth of literature on QOL measurement, we still have much more to learn about how to present information to patients and how to use preference data that patients provide. Improvements in the utility assessment method are urgently needed as well, as different utility-based measures such as standard gamble, time trade-off , and rating scales are not comparable. This lack of comparability has important implications when estimating quality-adjusted life-years in cost-utility studies. Another key unresolved issue is whether the Medical Outcomes Study 36-Item Short Form and the Health Assessment Questionnaire offer appropriate data for cost-utility studies. The current estimation of clinical benefit is also controversial, as competing measurement tools offer different estimates of wellness at baseline. However, the different approaches yield surprisingly similar estimates of change. Clearly, this observation deserves further study and replication in future studies.

    Cate of OECD: Health sciences

    Year of Publication: 2007

    Business Area: gamble

    Detail Business: gamble

    Country: India

    Study Area: utility, utility, patient, preference, disease

    Name of Journal: AMERICAN JOURNAL OF MANAGED CARE

    Language: English

    Country of Authors: Univ Calif Los Angeles, Sch Publ Hlth, Dept Hlth Serv, Los Angeles, CA 90095 USA

    Press Adress: Kaplan, RM (reprint author), Univ Calif Los Angeles, Sch Publ Hlth, Dept Hlth Serv, POB 951772, Los Angeles, CA 90095 USA.

    Email Address: rmkaplan@ucia.edu

    Citaion:

    Funding:

    Lists of Citation: Brazier J, 2002, J HEALTH ECON, V21, P271, DOI 10.1016/S0167-6296(01)00130-8; Broome L, 1993, Nurs Manage, V24, P51; BUSH JW, 1973, HLTH STATUS INDEXES, P172; BUSH JW, 1971, AM J PUBLIC HEALTH N, V61, P2362, DOI 10.2105/AJPH.61.12.2362; Chiou CF, 2006, J RHEUMATOL, V33, P2409; Damschroder LJ, 2007, MED DECIS MAKING, V27, P266, DOI 10.1177/0272989X07300601; FANSHEL S, 1970, OPER RES, V18, P1021, DOI 10.1287/opre.18.6.1021; FRIES JF, 1993, NEW ENGL J MED, V329, P321, DOI 10.1056/NEJM199307293290506; FRIES JF, 1982, J RHEUMATOL, V9, P789; FRIES JF, 1980, ARTHRITIS RHEUM, V23, P137, DOI 10.1002/art.1780230202; Fryback DG, 1997, MED DECIS MAKING, V17, P1, DOI 10.1177/0272989X9701700101; KAPLAN RM, 1995, PSYCHOSOM MED, V57, P138; Kaplan RM, 2005, MED CARE, V43, P79; KAPLAN RM, 1976, HEALTH SERV RES, V11, P478; Kaplan RM, 1982, HEALTH PSYCHOL, V1, P621; Kaplan RM, 1996, ARTHRIT CARE RES, V9, P473, DOI 10.1002/art.1790090609; Khanna D, 2007, ARTHRIT RHEUM-ARTHR, V57, P86, DOI 10.1002/art.22465; MEENAN RF, 1982, J RHEUMATOL, V9, P785; MEENAN RF, 1981, ARTHRITIS RHEUM, V24, P544, DOI 10.1002/art.1780240315; MEENAN RF, 1980, ARTHRITIS RHEUM, V23, P146, DOI 10.1002/art.1780230203; Nichol MB, 2001, MED DECIS MAKING, V21, P105, DOI 10.1177/02729890122062352; PATRICK DL, 1973, J HEALTH SOC BEHAV, V14, P6, DOI 10.2307/2136932; Patrick D L, 1973, Health Serv Res, V8, P228; REYNOLDS WJ, 1974, J HEALTH SOC BEHAV, V15, P271, DOI 10.2307/2137088; RICHARDSON J, 1994, SOC SCI MED, V39, P7, DOI 10.1016/0277-9536(94)90162-7; STEWART A, 1977, MED CARE, V15, P939, DOI 10.1097/00005650-197711000-00008; ZHU SH, 1991, ORGAN BEHAV HUM DEC, V48, P36, DOI 10.1016/0749-5978(91)90004-D; Zikmund-Fisher BJ, 2007, PATIENT EDUC COUNS, V66, P100, DOI 10.1016/j.pec.2006.10.013

    Number of Citaion: 28

    Publication: AMER MED PUBLISHING, M W C COMPANY

    City of Publication: JAMESBURG

    Address of Publication: 241 FORSGATE DR, STE 102, JAMESBURG, NJ 08831 USA

    ISSN: 1088-0224

    29-Character Source Abbreviation: AM J MANAG CARE

    ISO Source Abbreviation: Am. J. Manag. Care

    Volume: 13

    Version: 9

    Start of File: S252

    End of File: S255

    DOI:

    Number of Pages: 4

    Web of Science Category: Health Care Sciences & Services; Health Policy & Services; Medicine, General & Internal

    Subject Category: Health Care Sciences & Services; General & Internal Medicine

    Document Delivery Number: 249FV

    Unique Article Identifier: WOS:000252213900005

    reply : 0
  • list
  • prev
  • next