¼±È£¡¤°áÁ¤ | Cases and Studies of Preference and Decision-Making in Lottery & Gambling | ø¶û¿ & 决ïÒ
- Review] Lizard home ranges revisited: Effects of sex, body size, diet, habitat, and phylogeny
-
DocNo of ILP: 6206
Doc. Type: Review
Title: Lizard home ranges revisited: Effects of sex, body size, diet, habitat, and phylogeny
Authors: Perry, G; Garland, T
Full Name of Authors: Perry, G; Garland, T
Keywords by Author: allometry; Autarchoglossa; body size; diet; energetics; habitat; home range; Iguania; lizards; methodology; phylogeny; sex
Keywords Plus: MITOCHONDRIAL-DNA SEQUENCES; PHYLOGENETICALLY INDEPENDENT CONTRASTS; MABUYA GROUP REPTILIA; ANOLIS LIZARDS; PHRYNOSOMATID LIZARDS; MOLECULAR PERSPECTIVE; CONFIDENCE-INTERVALS; CONOLOPHUS-PALLIDUS; FAMILY LACERTIDAE; SITE SELECTION
Abstract: The area traversed by an animal during food gathering, mating, and other routine activities is termed the home range (HR), and its size is believed to reflect behavioral and physiological requirements (e.g., access to mates and food). We evaluated both biological and methodological factors that may affect estimated HR sizes of lizards. We compiled a database of nearly 500 published sex X population data sets. These yielded usable data for 108 populations from 60 species, all with both sexes represented. Initial analyses indicated pervasive sex differences, so sexes were analyzed separately with both conventional and phylogenetically based statistical methods. First, we conducted conventional analyses of covariance, which treat each data point as statistically independent. Second, we repeated these analyses while comparing members of two major clades represented in our database, Iguania and Autarchoglossa. Third, we repeated the analyses after designating smaller clades, nested within major clades. Fourth, we performed a fully phylogenctic analysis via independent contrasts and a composite phylogeny assembled from published studies. All analyses showed highly significant effects of both biological (body size, diet, habitat type) and most methodological (calculation method and minimum number of sightings per individual, but not study duration) factors and covariates tested. The conventional analysis comparing Iguania and Autarchoglossa en toto indicated a significant difference, as has been suggested in the literature. The analysis with nested minor clades, however, revealed differences among these but not between the two major clades. The analysis with phylogenetically independent contrasts indicated no statistically significant differences either among minor clades or between major clades. We also used our database to compare the scaling of HR area to body mass, using recently published allometric equations for field metabolic rates of lizards. The similarity of allometric slopes suggests that, interspecifically, HR size scales directly with energetic requirements. Intraspecifically, however, we found that males in both Autarchoglossa and Iguania consistently had larger HRs than did females. This difference, presumably related to the need to maximize access to females, may impose a "cost of reproduction" on males.
Cate of OECD: Biological sciences
Year of Publication: 2002
Business Area: other
Detail Business: medicine & science
Country: USA
Study Area:
Name of Journal: ECOLOGY
Language: English
Country of Authors: Univ Wisconsin, Dept Zool, Madison, WI 53706 USA
Press Adress: Perry, G (reprint author), Univ Wisconsin, Dept Zool, 430 Lincoln Dr, Madison, WI 53706 USA.
Email Address: Gperry@facstaff.wisc.edu
Citaion:
Funding:
Lists of Citation: Abouheif E, 1997, AM NAT, V149, P540, DOI 10.1086/286004; Ackerly DD, 1999, PHYSIOLOGICAL PLANT ECOLOGY, P391; ALBERTS AC, 1993, HERPETOLOGICA, V49, P469; ANDREWS RM, 1985, PHYSIOL ZOOL, V58, P214; ANDREWS RM, 1971, ECOLOGY, V52, P262, DOI 10.2307/1934584; ARMSTRONG JT, 1965, ECOLOGY, V46, P619, DOI 10.2307/1935001; Arnold E.N., 1989, Bulletin of the British Museum (Natural History) Zoology, V55, P209; ARNOLD EN, 1989, J NAT HIST, V23, P525, DOI 10.1080/00222938900770311; Arnold EN, 1997, ZOOL J LINN SOC-LOND, V119, P267; ARNOLD EN, 1973, ZOOLOGY, V25, P292; Bininda-Emonds ORP, 1999, BIOL REV, V74, P143, DOI 10.1017/S0006323199005307; Bininda-Emonds ORP, 2000, EVOLUTION, V54, P1011; Blob RW, 2000, J ZOOL, V250, P507, DOI 10.1017/S0952836900004088; Bonine KE, 1999, J ZOOL, V248, P255, DOI 10.1111/j.1469-7998.1999.tb01201.x; Bonine KE, 2001, J MORPHOL, V250, P265; Brashares JS, 2000, BEHAV ECOL, V11, P452, DOI 10.1093/beheco/11.4.452; BURRAGE B R, 1974, Annals of the South African Museum, V66, P1; Burt W. H., 1943, Journal of Mammalogy, V24, P346, DOI 10.2307/1374834; CHANGCHIEN LL, 1996, THESIS U WISCONSIN M; CHRISTIAN K, 1986, J HERPETOL, V20, P272, DOI 10.2307/1563959; CHRISTIAN KA, 1984, HERPETOLOGICA, V40, P68; CHRISTIAN KA, 1984, ECOLOGY, V65, P752, DOI 10.2307/1938047; CLINTON WL, 1993, ECOLOGY, V74, P1884, DOI 10.2307/1939945; Clobert J, 1998, J EVOLUTION BIOL, V11, P329; COOPER WE, 1995, ANIM BEHAV, V50, P973, DOI 10.1016/0003-3472(95)80098-0; Cruz-Neto AP, 2001, ZOOL-ANAL COMPLEX SY, V104, P49, DOI 10.1078/0944-2006-00006; DENARDO DF, 1994, HORM BEHAV, V28, P273, DOI 10.1006/hbeh.1994.1023; DRUMMOND H, 1983, BEHAVIOUR, V86, P1, DOI 10.1163/156853983X00543; Dunham A.E., 1988, Biology of Reptilia, V16, P441; Estes R., 1988, P119; FELSENSTEIN J, 1985, AM NAT, V125, P1, DOI 10.1086/284325; Fitch H.S., 1981, U KANSAS MUS NAT HIS, V70, P1; Ford RG, 1981, STUD AVIAN BIOL, V6, P461; Frost D. R., 1989, MISC PUBL U KANSAS M, V81, P1; FROST DR, 1992, AM MUSEUM NOVITATES, V3033; Fu JZ, 2000, BIOL J LINN SOC, V71, P203, DOI 10.1006/bijl.1999.0431; Fu JZ, 1998, MOL PHYLOGENET EVOL, V9, P118, DOI 10.1006/mpev.1997.0456; Fuller S, 1998, MOL PHYLOGENET EVOL, V9, P294, DOI 10.1006/mpev.1997.0476; GARLAND T, 1993, SYST BIOL, V42, P265, DOI 10.2307/2992464; Garland T, 1999, AM ZOOL, V39, P374; Garland T, 1999, SYST BIOL, V48, P547; GARLAND T, 1994, PHYSIOL ZOOL, V67, P797; Garland T, 2000, AM NAT, V155, P346; Garland T, 1999, ANIM BEHAV, V58, P77, DOI 10.1006/anbe.1999.1132; GARLAND T, 1992, SYST BIOL, V41, P18, DOI 10.2307/2992503; GARLAND T, 1994, ANNU REV PHYSIOL, V56, P579; Gautestad AO, 1995, OIKOS, V74, P195, DOI 10.2307/3545648; GOMPPER ME, 1991, OECOLOGIA, V87, P343, DOI 10.1007/BF00634589; GRAFEN A, 1989, PHILOS T ROY SOC B, V326, P119, DOI 10.1098/rstb.1989.0106; Greene H. W., 1982, ENV ADAPTATION EVOLU, P107; GREER A E, 1970, Bulletin of the Museum of Comparative Zoology, V139, P151; HARESTAD AS, 1979, ECOLOGY, V60, P389, DOI 10.2307/1937667; Harris DJ, 1998, P ROY SOC B-BIOL SCI, V265, P1939; Harris DJ, 1999, COPEIA, P749; Harris DJ, 1999, HERPETOL J, V9, P147; HARRIS S, 1990, MAMMAL REV, V20, P97, DOI 10.1111/j.1365-2907.1990.tb00106.x; Harvey MB, 2000, ZOOL J LINN SOC-LOND, V128, P189; Harvey P.H., 1991, COMP METHOD EVOLUTIO; HEWS DK, 1993, ANIM BEHAV, V46, P279, DOI 10.1006/anbe.1993.1189; Honda M, 2000, MOL PHYLOGENET EVOL, V15, P452, DOI 10.1006/mpev.1999.0767; Honda M, 1999, ZOOL SCI, V16, P979, DOI 10.2108/zsj.16.979; Honda M, 2000, ZOOL SCI, V17, P527; Honda M, 1999, GENES GENET SYST, V74, P135, DOI 10.1266/ggs.74.135; HUEY RB, 1989, ECOLOGY, V70, P931, DOI 10.2307/1941360; Huey RB, 1983, LIZARD ECOLOGY STUDI; Irschick DJ, 2000, PHYSIOL BIOCHEM ZOOL, V73, P428, DOI 10.1086/317733; IVERSON J B, 1979, Bulletin of the Florida State Museum Biological Sciences, V24, P175; Jackman TR, 1999, SYST BIOL, V48, P254; JENNRICH RI, 1969, J THEOR BIOL, V22, P227, DOI 10.1016/0022-5193(69)90002-2; Jenssen TA, 1998, BEHAVIOUR, V135, P981; JOGER U, 1991, COPEIA, P616; Kelt DA, 2001, AM NAT, V157, P637, DOI 10.1086/320621; KLUGE A.G., 1987, MISCELLANEOUS PUBLIC, V173; Lazell James, 1997, Herpetological Review, V28, P150; LOSOS JB, 1990, ECOL MONOGR, V60, P369, DOI 10.2307/1943062; MACE GM, 1983, AM NAT, V121, P120, DOI 10.1086/284043; Mace G.M., 1983, P32; Macey JR, 2000, SYST BIOL, V49, P233; Macey JR, 1997, J MOL EVOL, V44, P660, DOI 10.1007/PL00006190; MARLER CA, 1995, BEHAV ECOL SOCIOBIOL, V37, P225, DOI 10.1007/BF00177401; Martel JG, 1998, ADV PERFORM MATER, V5, P5, DOI 10.1023/A:1008672614368; Martins E., 1996, PHYLOGENIES COMP MET; Martins EP, 1998, ANIM BEHAV, V56, P1113, DOI 10.1006/anbe.1998.0872; MARTINS EP, 1993, AM NAT, V142, P994, DOI 10.1086/285585; MARTINS EP, 1994, LIZARD ECOLOGY, P117; MCGUIRE JA, 1996, B CARNAGIE MUSEUM NA, V32; MCNAB BK, 1963, AM NAT, V97, P133, DOI 10.1086/282264; Miles DB, 2000, EVOLUTION, V54, P1386; MILSTEAD W W, 1972, Herpetological Review, V4, P83; MILTON K, 1976, NATURE, V259, P459, DOI 10.1038/259459a0; Mysterud A, 2001, OECOLOGIA, V127, P30, DOI 10.1007/s004420000562; Nagy KA, 1999, ANNU REV NUTR, V19, P247, DOI 10.1146/annurev.nutr.19.1.247; Nunn CL, 2000, AM NAT, V156, P519, DOI 10.1086/303405; Obst F.J., 1988, COMPLETELY ILLUSTRAT; Perry Gad, 1992, Amphibia-Reptilia, V13, P275, DOI 10.1163/156853892X00481; Perry G, 1999, AM NAT, V153, P98, DOI 10.1086/303145; PERRY G, 1989, ISR J ZOOL, V36, P129; Perry Gad, 1997, Herpetological Review, V28, P150; Perry G, 1997, TRENDS ECOL EVOL, V12, P360, DOI 10.1016/S0169-5347(97)01097-5; PETERS R H, 1977, Environmental Biology of Fishes, V2, P97, DOI 10.1007/BF00005365; Pianka ER, 1986, ECOLOGY NATURAL HIST; Pough F. H., 2001, HERPETOLOGY; POUGH FH, 1980, AM NAT, V115, P92, DOI 10.1086/283547; Powell Roger A., 2000, P65; PRESCH W, 1974, Bulletin Southern California Academy of Sciences, V73, P23; Purvis Andrew, 1999, P44, DOI 10.1017/CBO9780511542466.005; Rassmann K, 1997, MOL PHYLOGENET EVOL, V7, P158, DOI 10.1006/mpev.1996.0386; Reeder Tod W., 1996, Herpetological Monographs, V10, P43, DOI 10.2307/1466980; REISS M, 1988, TRENDS ECOL EVOL, V3, P85, DOI 10.1016/0169-5347(88)90025-0; Robertson PA, 1998, J APPL ECOL, V35, P928; Rogner M., 1997, LIZARDS, V2; ROGNER M, 1997, LIZARDS HUSBANDRY RE, V1; ROSE B, 1982, J HERPETOL, V16, P253, DOI 10.2307/1563718; Schoener T. W., 1971, ANNU REV ECOL SYST, V2, P369, DOI DOI 10.1146/ANNUREV.ES.02.110171.002101; SCHOENER TW, 1981, THEOR POPUL BIOL, V20, P281, DOI 10.1016/0040-5809(81)90049-6; SCHOENER TW, 1982, ECOLOGY, V63, P809, DOI 10.2307/1936801; SCHOENER TW, 1968, ECOLOGY, V49, P123, DOI 10.2307/1933567; Schulte JA, 1998, MOL PHYLOGENET EVOL, V10, P367, DOI 10.1006/mpev.1998.0541; Sinervo B, 1996, NATURE, V380, P240, DOI 10.1038/380240a0; Sokal R.R., 1995, BIOMETRY; SOMMA LA, 1990, SMITHSONIAN HERPETOL, V81, P1; SPSS, 1999, SPSS BAS 10 0 APPL G; *SPSS, 1999, SPSS BAS 10 0; Stamps J., 1977, BIOL REPTILIA, V7, P265; STAMPS JA, 1994, COPEIA, P598, DOI 10.2307/1447176; Stamps JA, 1983, LIZARD ECOLOGY STUDI, P169; STEBBINS RC, 1985, FIELD GUIDE W AMPHIB; Stickel LF, 1968, SPECIAL PUBLICATION, P373; SWIHART RK, 1988, ECOLOGY, V69, P393, DOI 10.2307/1940437; TRIVERS RL, 1976, EVOLUTION, V30, P253, DOI 10.2307/2407700; TURNER FB, 1969, ECOLOGY, V50, P1076, DOI 10.2307/1936898; Vanhooydonck B, 1999, EVOL ECOL RES, V1, P785; Vitt LJ, 1994, LIZARD ECOLOGY HIST; WALDSCHMIDT SR, 1979, AM MIDL NAT, V101, P236, DOI 10.2307/2424919; WERNER YL, 1971, SYST ZOOL, V20, P249, DOI 10.2307/2412063; Wiens John J., 1997, Herpetological Monographs, V11, P1, DOI 10.2307/1467007; Wiens JJ, 2000, SYST BIOL, V49, P143; Williamson M, 1999, ECOGRAPHY, V22, P674, DOI 10.1111/j.1600-0587.1999.tb00516.x; Wolf CM, 1998, BIOL CONSERV, V86, P243
Number of Citaion: 139
Publication: ECOLOGICAL SOC AMER
City of Publication: WASHINGTON
Address of Publication: 1990 M STREET NW, STE 700, WASHINGTON, DC 20036 USA
ISSN: 0012-9658
29-Character Source Abbreviation: ECOLOGY
ISO Source Abbreviation: Ecology
Volume: 83
Version: 7
Start of File: 1870
End of File: 1885
DOI: 10.2307/3071771
Number of Pages: 16
Web of Science Category: Ecology
Subject Category: Environmental Sciences & Ecology
Document Delivery Number: 571LD
Unique Article Identifier: WOS:000176718100008
[ÀÌ °Ô½Ã¹°Àº HyeJung Mo¡¦´Ô¿¡ ÀÇÇØ 2015-05-20 21:22:30 GAMBLING¿¡¼ À̵¿ µÊ]
- reply : 0
-
- list
-
- prev
- next