• HOME
    KOREAN
    CHINESS
    SITE MAP
    JOIN
  • Username (Site Login ID)
  • Password
  • Forgot your password?

  • À§Çè°ü¸® | Cases and Studies of Risk Management in Lottery & Gambling | êËúÏη×â

    date : 2015-05-20 01:10|hit : 2589
    Article] Behavioral and neural correlates of loss aversion and risk avoidance in adolescents and adults
    DocNo of ILP: 928

    Doc. Type: Article

    Title: Behavioral and neural correlates of loss aversion and risk avoidance in adolescents and adults

    Authors: Barkley-Levenson, EE; Van Leijenhorst, L; Galvan, A

    Full Name of Authors: Barkley-Levenson, Emily E.; Van Leijenhorst, Linda; Galvan, Adriana

    Keywords by Author: Loss aversion; Risk; Decision-making; Adolescence; Development; fMRI

    Keywords Plus: DECISION-MAKING; ORBITOFRONTAL CORTEX; BRAIN ACTIVATION; AGE-DIFFERENCES; PROSPECT-THEORY; REWARD; CHILDREN; CHOICES; REPRESENTATION; PERSPECTIVE

    Abstract: Individuals are frequently faced with risky decisions involving the potential for both gain and loss. Exploring the role of both potential gains and potential losses in predicting risk taking is critical to understanding how adolescents and adults make the choice to engage in or avoid a real-life risk. This study aimed to examine the impact of potential losses as well as gains on adolescent decisions during risky choice in a laboratory task. Adolescent (n=18) and adult (n=16) participants underwent functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) during a mixed gambles task, and completed questionnaires measuring real-world risk-taking behaviors. While potential loss had a significantly greater effect on choice than potential gain in both adolescents and adults and there were no behavioral group differences on the task, adolescents recruited significantly more frontostriatal circuitry than adults when choosing to reject a gamble. During risk-seeking behavior, adolescent activation in medial prefrontal cortex (mPFC) was negatively correlated with self-reported likelihood of risk taking. During risk-avoidant behavior, mPFC activation of in adults was negatively correlated with self-reported benefits of risk-taking. Taken together, these findings reflect different neural patterns during risk-taking and risk-avoidant behaviors in adolescents and adults. (C) 2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

    Cate of OECD: Basic medicine

    Year of Publication: 2013

    Business Area: gamble

    Detail Business: gamble

    Country: England

    Study Area: development, development, correlationperspective theory, correlation, perspective theory, adolescent, behavior, risk

    Name of Journal: DEVELOPMENTAL COGNITIVE NEUROSCIENCE

    Language: English

    Country of Authors: [Barkley-Levenson, Emily E.; Van Leijenhorst, Linda; Galvan, Adriana] Univ Calif Los Angeles, Dept Psychol, Los Angeles, CA 90095 USA; [Galvan, Adriana] Univ Calif Los Angeles, Brain Res Inst, Los Angeles, CA 90095 USA

    Press Adress: Galvan, A (reprint author), Univ Calif Los Angeles, Dept Psychol, 1285 Franz Hall,Box 951563, Los Angeles, CA 90095 USA.

    Email Address: ebarkley@ucla.edu; lleijenhorst@fsw.leidenuniv.nl; agalvan@ucla.edu

    Citaion:

    Funding: UCLA Pre-Doctoral Training Program in the Translational Neuroscience of Drug Abuse; Rubicon grant from the Netherlands Organization for Scientific Research (NWO)

    Lists of Citation: ALEXANDER CS, 1990, J YOUTH ADOLESCENCE, V19, P559, DOI 10.1007/BF01537176; ARNETT J, 1992, DEV REV, V12, P339, DOI 10.1016/0273-2297(92)90013-R; Arnett JJ, 1999, AM PSYCHOL, V54, P317, DOI 10.1037//0003-066X.54.5.317; Bell EC, 2006, NEUROIMAGE, V30, P529, DOI 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2005.09.049; Bjork JM, 2004, J NEUROSCI, V24, P1793, DOI 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4862-03.2004; Bjork JM, 2010, PLOS ONE, V5, DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0011440; Casey BJ, 2008, ANN NY ACAD SCI, V1124, P111, DOI 10.1196/annals.1440.010; Dahl RE, 2004, ANN NY ACAD SCI, V1021, P1, DOI 10.1196/annals.1308.001; Delgado MR, 2000, J NEUROPHYSIOL, V84, P3072; Eshel N, 2007, NEUROPSYCHOLOGIA, V45, P1270, DOI 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2006.10.004; Figner B, 2011, CURR DIR PSYCHOL SCI, V20, P211, DOI 10.1177/0963721411415790; Figner B, 2009, J EXP PSYCHOL LEARN, V35, P709, DOI 10.1037/a0014983; Galvan A, 2006, J NEUROSCI, V26, P6885, DOI 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1062-06.2006; Galvan A, 2007, DEVELOPMENTAL SCI, V10, pF8, DOI 10.1111/j.1467-7687.2006.00579.x; Gardner M, 2005, DEV PSYCHOL, V41, P625, DOI 10.1037/0012-1649.41.4.625; Geier CF, 2010, CEREB CORTEX, V20, P1613, DOI 10.1093/cercor/bhp225; Guyer AE, 2006, J NEUROSCI, V26, P6399, DOI 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0666-06.2006; Harbaugh WT, 2002, EXP ECON, V5, P53, DOI 10.1023/A:1016316725855; Harbaugh WT, 2001, ECON LETT, V70, P175, DOI 10.1016/S0165-1765(00)00359-1; Hare TA, 2008, J NEUROSCI, V28, P5623, DOI 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1309-08.2008; Helfinstein SM, 2011, NEUROPSYCHOLOGIA, V49, P479, DOI 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2010.12.015; KAHNEMAN D, 1984, AM PSYCHOL, V39, P341, DOI 10.1037//0003-066X.39.4.341; KAHNEMAN D, 1979, ECONOMETRICA, V47, P263, DOI 10.2307/1914185; Kobberling V, 2005, J ECON THEORY, V122, P119, DOI 10.1016/j.jet.2004.03.009; Lapsley DK, 2010, J YOUTH ADOLESCENCE, V39, P847, DOI 10.1007/s10964-009-9409-9; Lee TMC, 2009, CEREB CORTEX, V19, P1303, DOI 10.1093/cercor/bhn172; Levin IP, 2007, J BEHAV DECIS MAKING, V20, P241, DOI 10.1002/bdm.552; Levin IP, 2003, J BEHAV DECIS MAKING, V16, P397, DOI 10.1002/bdm.453; Levy I, 2010, J NEUROPHYSIOL, V103, P1036, DOI 10.1152/jn.00853.2009; Lighthall NR, 2012, SOC COGN AFFECT NEUR, V7, P476, DOI 10.1093/scan/nsr026; May JC, 2004, BIOL PSYCHIAT, V55, P359, DOI 10.1016/j.biopsych.2003.11.008; Rabin M, 2001, J ECON PERSPECT, V15, P219, DOI 10.1257/jep.15.1.219; Rao U, 2011, J ADOLESCENT HEALTH, V48, P151, DOI 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2010.06.008; Reyna VF, 2006, PSYCHOL SCI, P1, DOI 10.1145/1142680.1142682; Rolls ET, 2000, CEREB CORTEX, V10, P284, DOI 10.1093/cercor/10.3.284; Steinberg L, 2004, ANN NY ACAD SCI, V1021, P51, DOI 10.1196/annals.1308.005; Steinberg L, 2008, DEV REV, V28, P78, DOI 10.1016/j.dr.2007.08.002; Steinberg L, 2008, DEV PSYCHOL, V44, P1764, DOI 10.1037/a0012955; THALER R.H., 1990, MANAGEMENT SCI, V36; Tom SM, 2007, SCIENCE, V315, P515, DOI 10.1126/science.1134239; TVERSKY A, 1992, J RISK UNCERTAINTY, V5, P297, DOI 10.1007/BF00122574; Van Leijenhorst L, 2010, NEUROIMAGE, V51, P345, DOI 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2010.02.038; Van Leijenhorst L, 2010, CEREB CORTEX, V20, P61, DOI 10.1093/cercor/bhp078; Weber EU, 2002, J BEHAV DECIS MAKING, V15, P263, DOI 10.1002/bdm.414; Weller JA, 2011, J BEHAV DECIS MAKING, V24, P331, DOI 10.1002/bdm.690

    Number of Citaion: 45

    Publication: ELSEVIER SCI LTD

    City of Publication: OXFORD

    Address of Publication: THE BOULEVARD, LANGFORD LANE, KIDLINGTON, OXFORD OX5 1GB, OXON, ENGLAND

    ISSN: 1878-9293

    29-Character Source Abbreviation: DEV COGN NEUROS-NETH

    ISO Source Abbreviation: Dev. Cogn. Neurosci.

    Volume: 3

    Version:

    Start of File: 72

    End of File: 83

    DOI: 10.1016/j.dcn.2012.09.007

    Number of Pages: 12

    Web of Science Category: Neurosciences

    Subject Category: Neurosciences & Neurology

    Document Delivery Number: 095EU

    Unique Article Identifier: WOS:000315318300009

    [ÀÌ °Ô½Ã¹°Àº HyeJung Mo¡¦´Ô¿¡ ÀÇÇØ 2015-05-20 17:09:59 GAMBLING¿¡¼­ À̵¿ µÊ]
    reply : 0
  • list
  • next