• HOME
    KOREAN
    CHINESS
    SITE MAP
    JOIN
  • Username (Site Login ID)
  • Password
  • Forgot your password?

  • À§Çè°ü¸® | Cases and Studies of Risk Management in Lottery & Gambling | êËúÏη×â

    date : 2015-05-20 01:10|hit : 2643
    Article] The Role of Experience Sampling and Graphical Displays on One's Investment Risk Appetite
    DocNo of ILP: 843

    Doc. Type: Article

    Title: The Role of Experience Sampling and Graphical Displays on One's Investment Risk Appetite

    Authors: Kaufmann, C; Weber, M; Haisley, E

    Full Name of Authors: Kaufmann, Christine; Weber, Martin; Haisley, Emily

    Keywords by Author: risk taking; asset allocation; risk perception; experience-description gap; presentation format

    Keywords Plus: LIFETIME PORTFOLIO SELECTION; REPEATED GAMBLES; PROSPECT-THEORY; PERCEIVED RISK; DECISIONS; CHOICE; PERCEPTION; PROBABILITIES; CONSUMPTION; CONSTRAINTS

    Abstract: Financial professionals have a great deal of discretion concerning how to relay information about the risk of financial products to their clients. This paper introduces a new risk tool to communicate the risk of investment products, and it examines how different risk-presentation modes influence risk-taking behavior and investors' recall ability of the risk-return profile of financial products. We analyze four different ways of communicating risk: (i) numerical descriptions, (ii) experience sampling, (iii) graphical displays, and (iv) a combination of these formats in the "risk tool." Participants receive information about a risky and a risk-free fund and make an allocation between the two in an experimental investment portfolio. We find that risky allocations are elevated in both the risk tool and experience sampling conditions. Greater risky allocations in the risk tool condition are associated with decreased risk perception, increased confidence in the risky fund, and a lower estimation of the probability of a loss. In addition to these favorable perceptions of the risky fund, participants in the risk tool condition are more accurate on recall questions regarding the expected return and the probability of a loss. We find no evidence of greater dissatisfaction with returns in these conditions, and we observe a willingness to take on similar levels of risk in subsequent allocations.

    Cate of OECD: Economics and business

    Year of Publication: 2013

    Business Area: gamble

    Detail Business: gamble

    Country: Germany

    Study Area: invest, invest, probabilityperspective theory, probability, perspective theory, behavior, risk

    Name of Journal: MANAGEMENT SCIENCE

    Language: English

    Country of Authors: [Kaufmann, Christine; Weber, Martin] Univ Mannheim, Lehrstuhl Bankbetriebslehre, D-68131 Mannheim, Germany; [Weber, Martin] Ctr Econ Policy Res, London EC1V 3PZ, England; [Haisley, Emily] Barclays PLC, London E14 5HP, England

    Press Adress: Kaufmann, C (reprint author), Univ Mannheim, Lehrstuhl Bankbetriebslehre, D-68131 Mannheim, Germany.

    Email Address: kaufmann@bank.bwl.uni-mannheim.de; weber@bank.bwl.uni-mannheim.de; emily.haisley@barclays.com

    Citaion:

    Funding:

    Lists of Citation: Abdellaoui M, 2011, MANAGE SCI, V57, P1879, DOI 10.1287/mnsc.1110.1368; Andersen S, 2011, REV FINANC STUD, V24, P1667, DOI 10.1093/rfs/hhq146; Arrow Kenneth, 1971, ESSAYS THEORY RISK B; BARON J, 1988, J PERS SOC PSYCHOL, V54, P569, DOI 10.1037//0022-3514.54.4.569; Barron G, 2003, J BEHAV DECIS MAKING, V16, P215, DOI 10.1002/bdm.443; Benartzi S, 1999, MANAGE SCI, V45, P364, DOI 10.1287/mnsc.45.3.364; Beshears J, 2011, 16868 NBER; Campbell JY, 2006, J FINANC, V61, P1553, DOI 10.1111/j.1540-6261.2006.00883.x; DAI, 2011, DAI FACTB 2011; Fox CR, 2006, JUDGM DECIS MAK, V1, P159; Glaser M., 2010, BEHAV FINANCE INVEST, P241; Goldstein DG, 2008, J CONSUM RES, V35, P440, DOI 10.1086/589562; Gomes F, 2005, J FINANC, V60, P869, DOI 10.1111/j.1540-6261.2005.00749.x; Hadar L, 2009, JUDGM DECIS MAK, V4, P317; Haliassos M, 2003, INT ECON REV, V44, P143, DOI 10.1111/1468-2354.t01-1-00065; Hanoch Y, 2006, PSYCHOL SCI, V17, P300, DOI 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2006.01702.x; Hau R, 2008, J BEHAV DECIS MAKING, V21, P493, DOI 10.1002/bdm.598; Hertwig R, 2009, TRENDS COGN SCI, V13, P517, DOI 10.1016/j.tics.2009.09.004; Hertwig R, 2004, PSYCHOL SCI, V15, P534, DOI 10.1111/j.0956-7976.2004.00715.x; Hong H, 2005, J FINANC, V60, P2801, DOI 10.1111/j.1540-6261.2005.00817.x; Jacobs H, 2010, SHOULD PRIVATE INVES; Jia JM, 1999, MANAGE SCI, V45, P519, DOI 10.1287/mnsc.45.4.519; KAHNEMAN D, 1979, ECONOMETRICA, V47, P263, DOI 10.2307/1914185; Keller CR, 1986, ORG BEHAV HUM DECISI, V38, P114; Klos A, 2005, MANAGE SCI, V51, P1777, DOI 10.1287/mnsc.1050.0429; Lejarraga T, 2010, J BEHAV DECIS MAKING, V23, P100, DOI 10.1002/bdm.666; Markowitz H, 1952, J FINANC, V7, P77, DOI 10.2307/2975974; MERTON RC, 1969, REV ECON STAT, V51, P247, DOI 10.2307/1926560; MERTON RC, 1971, J ECON THEORY, V3, P373, DOI 10.1016/0022-0531(71)90038-X; Nosic A, 2010, DECIS ANAL, V7, P282, DOI 10.1287/deca.1100.0178; Poterba JM, 2000, J ECON PERSPECT, V14, P99, DOI 10.1257/jep.14.2.99; Rakow T, 2010, J BEHAV DECIS MAKING, V23, P1, DOI 10.1002/bdm.681; SAMUELSON PA, 1969, REV ECON STAT, V51, P239, DOI 10.2307/1926559; SARIN RK, 1993, EUR J OPER RES, V70, P135, DOI 10.1016/0377-2217(93)90033-J; Siebenmorgen N., 2004, J BEHAV FINANC, V5, P75, DOI 10.1207/s15427579jpfm0502_2; Ungemach C, 2009, PSYCHOL SCI, V20, P473, DOI 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2009.02319.x; van Rooij M, 2011, J FINANC ECON, V101, P449, DOI 10.1016/j.jfineco.2011.03.006; Weber EU, 1997, MANAGE SCI, V43, P123, DOI 10.1287/mnsc.43.2.123; Weber EU, 2005, RISK ANAL, V25, P597, DOI 10.1111/j.1539-6924.2005.00627.x; Weber EU, 2002, J BEHAV DECIS MAKING, V15, P263, DOI 10.1002/bdm.414; Weber EU, 2004, PSYCHOL REV, V111, P430, DOI 10.1037/0033-295X.111.2.430; Zeldes Stephen, 2004, DO HOUSEHOLD PORTFOL

    Number of Citaion: 42

    Publication: INFORMS

    City of Publication: HANOVER

    Address of Publication: 7240 PARKWAY DR, STE 310, HANOVER, MD 21076-1344 USA

    ISSN: 0025-1909

    29-Character Source Abbreviation: MANAGE SCI

    ISO Source Abbreviation: Manage. Sci.

    Volume: 59

    Version: 2

    Start of File: 323

    End of File: 340

    DOI: 10.1287/mnsc.1120.1607

    Number of Pages: 18

    Web of Science Category: Management; Operations Research & Management Science

    Subject Category: Business & Economics; Operations Research & Management Science

    Document Delivery Number: 088SR

    Unique Article Identifier: WOS:000314857900004

    [ÀÌ °Ô½Ã¹°Àº HyeJung Mo¡¦´Ô¿¡ ÀÇÇØ 2015-05-20 17:09:59 GAMBLING¿¡¼­ À̵¿ µÊ]
    reply : 0
  • list
  • prev
  • next