• HOME
    KOREAN
    CHINESS
    SITE MAP
    JOIN
  • Username (Site Login ID)
  • Password
  • Forgot your password?

  • À§Çè°ü¸® | Cases and Studies of Risk Management in Lottery & Gambling | êËúÏη×â

    date : 2015-05-20 01:10|hit : 1722
    Article] The reflection effect for constant risk averse agents
    DocNo of ILP: 6655

    Doc. Type: Article

    Title: The reflection effect for constant risk averse agents

    Authors: Smorodinsky, R

    Full Name of Authors: Smorodinsky, R

    Keywords by Author: reflection effect; betweenness; constant risk aversion

    Keywords Plus: EXPECTED UTILITY; CHOICE

    Abstract: Assume a decision maker has a preference relation over monetary lotteries. The reflection effect, first observed by Kahneman and Tversky, states that the preference order for two lotteries is reversed once they are multiplied by - 1. The decision maker is constant risk averse (CRA) if adding the same constant to two distributions, or multiplying them by the same positive constant, will not change the preference relation between them. We combine these two axioms with the betweenness axiom and continuity, and prove a representation theorem. A technical curiosity is that the functions we get satisfy the betweenness axiom, yet are not necessarily Gateaux (nor Frechet) differentiable. (C) 2000 Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved.

    Cate of OECD: Economics and business

    Year of Publication: 2000

    Business Area: lottery

    Detail Business: lottery

    Country: Netherlands

    Study Area:

    Name of Journal: MATHEMATICAL SOCIAL SCIENCES

    Language: English

    Country of Authors: Technion Israel Inst Technol, Davidson Fac Ind Engn & Management, IL-32000 Haifa, Israel

    Press Adress: Smorodinsky, R (reprint author), Technion Israel Inst Technol, Davidson Fac Ind Engn & Management, IL-32000 Haifa, Israel.

    Email Address:

    Citaion:

    Funding:

    Lists of Citation: CHEW SH, 1989, ANN OPER RES, V19, P272; CHEW SH, 1987, J ECON THEORY, V42, P370; COOMBS CH, 1976, J MATH PSYCHOL, V13, P323, DOI 10.1016/0022-2496(76)90024-9; DEKEL E, 1986, J ECON THEORY, V40, P304, DOI 10.1016/0022-0531(86)90076-1; KAHNEMAN D, 1979, ECONOMETRICA, V47, P263, DOI 10.2307/1914185; KARMARKAR US, 1978, ORGAN BEHAV HUM PERF, V21, P61, DOI 10.1016/0030-5073(78)90039-9; MACHINA MJ, 1982, ECONOMETRICA, V50, P277, DOI 10.2307/1912631; Nash JF, 1950, ECONOMETRICA, V18, P155, DOI 10.2307/1907266; ROBERTS KWS, 1980, REV ECON STUD, V47, P421, DOI 10.2307/2297002; Safra Z, 1998, J ECON THEORY, V83, P19, DOI 10.1006/jeth.1997.2457; Savage L., 1954, FDN STAT; SMORODINSKY R, 1995, UNPUB NASHS BARGAINI; WAKKER PP, 1997, SIMPLE AXIOMATIZATIO; YAARI ME, 1987, ECONOMETRICA, V55, P95, DOI 10.2307/1911158

    Number of Citaion: 14

    Publication: ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV

    City of Publication: AMSTERDAM

    Address of Publication: PO BOX 211, 1000 AE AMSTERDAM, NETHERLANDS

    ISSN: 0165-4896

    29-Character Source Abbreviation: MATH SOC SCI

    ISO Source Abbreviation: Math. Soc. Sci.

    Volume: 40

    Version: 3

    Start of File: 265

    End of File: 276

    DOI: 10.1016/S0165-4896(00)00046-9

    Number of Pages: 12

    Web of Science Category: Economics; Mathematics, Interdisciplinary Applications; Social Sciences, Mathematical Methods

    Subject Category: Business & Economics; Mathematics; Mathematical Methods In Social Sciences

    Document Delivery Number: 366ZV

    Unique Article Identifier: WOS:000090036900002

    [ÀÌ °Ô½Ã¹°Àº HyeJung Mo¡¦´Ô¿¡ ÀÇÇØ 2015-05-20 17:08:07 GAMBLING¿¡¼­ À̵¿ µÊ]
    reply : 0
  • list
  • prev
  • next