기술·알고리즘 | Cases and Studies of Technology & Algorithm in Lottery & Gambling | 技术 & 算法
- date : 2015-05-20 01:10|hit : 2504
-
- Article] ERP components associated with successful and unsuccessful stopping in a stop-signal task
-
DocNo of ILP: 5790
Doc. Type: Article
Title: ERP components associated with successful and unsuccessful stopping in a stop-signal task
Authors: Kok, A; Ramautar, JR; De Ruiter, MB; Band, GPH; Ridderinkhof, KR
Full Name of Authors: Kok, A; Ramautar, JR; De Ruiter, MB; Band, GPH; Ridderinkhof, KR
Keywords by Author: stop-signal paradigm; response inhibition; successful stop trials; unsuccessful stop trials; horse race model; N2; P3; event-related potential components
Keywords Plus: EVENT-RELATED FMRI; ANTERIOR CINGULATE CORTEX; INHIBITORY MOTOR CONTROL; GO NOGO TASKS; RESPONSE-INHIBITION; PARIETAL CORTEX; ERROR-DETECTION; GO/NO-GO; BRAIN ACTIVATIONS; PREFRONTAL CORTEX
Abstract: The primary aim of this study was to examine how response inhibition is reflected in components of the event-related potential (ERP), using the stop-signal paradigm as a tool to manipulate response inhibition processes. Stop signals elicited a sequence of N2/P3 components that partly overlapped with ERP components elicited by the reaction stimulus. N2/P3 components were more pronounced on stop-signal trials than on no-stop-signal trials. At Cz, the stop-signal P3 peaked earlier on successful than on unsuccessful stop trials. This finding extends the horse race model by demonstrating that the internal response to the stop signal (as reflected in stop-signal P3) is not constant, but terminates at different moments in time on successful and unsuccessful stop trials. In addition, topographical distributions and dipole analysis of high density EEG recordings indicated that different cortical generators were involved in Pas elicited on successful and unsuccessful stop-signal trials. The latter results suggest that P3 on successful stop-signal trials not only reflects stop-signal processing per se, but also efficiency of inhibitory control.
Cate of OECD: Psychology
Year of Publication: 2004
Business Area: horse race
Detail Business: horse race
Country: England
Study Area: regulation, control
Name of Journal: PSYCHOPHYSIOLOGY
Language: English
Country of Authors: Univ Amsterdam, Dept Psychol, NL-1018 WB Amsterdam, Netherlands; Leiden Univ, Dept Psychol, NL-2300 RA Leiden, Netherlands
Press Adress: Kok, A (reprint author), Univ Amsterdam, Dept Psychol, Roetersstr 15, NL-1018 WB Amsterdam, Netherlands.
Email Address: akok@fmg.uva.nl
Citaion:
Funding:
Lists of Citation: BAND GPH, 2002, ACTA PSYCHOL, V112, P105; Botvinick M, 1999, NATURE, V402, P179, DOI 10.1038/46035; Burle B, 2002, PSYCHOL RES-PSYCH FO, V66, P324, DOI 10.1007/s00426-002-0105-6; Carter CS, 1998, SCIENCE, V280, P747, DOI 10.1126/science.280.5364.747; Coles MGH, 2001, BIOL PSYCHOL, V56, P173, DOI 10.1016/S0301-0511(01)00076-X; DEHAENE S, 1994, PSYCHOL SCI, V5, P303, DOI 10.1111/j.1467-9280.1994.tb00630.x; DEJONG R, 1995, J EXP PSYCHOL HUMAN, V21, P498, DOI 10.1037//0096-1523.21.3.498; DEJONG R, 1990, J EXP PSYCHOL HUMAN, V16, P164, DOI 10.1037/0096-1523.16.1.164; EIMER M, 1993, BIOL PSYCHOL, V35, P123, DOI 10.1016/0301-0511(93)90009-W; Falkenstein M, 2000, BIOL PSYCHOL, V51, P87, DOI 10.1016/S0301-0511(99)00031-9; Falkenstein M, 1999, ACTA PSYCHOL, V101, P267, DOI 10.1016/S0001-6918(99)00008-6; FALKENSTEIN M, 1995, EVOKED POTENTIAL, V96, P36, DOI 10.1016/0013-4694(94)00182-K; FALKENSTEIN M, 1991, ELECTROEN CLIN NEURO, V78, P447, DOI 10.1016/0013-4694(91)90062-9; GEHRING WJ, 1993, PSYCHOL SCI, V4, P385, DOI 10.1111/j.1467-9280.1993.tb00586.x; GOLDBERG G, 1985, BEHAV BRAIN SCI, V8, P567; Heil M, 2000, J PSYCHOPHYSIOL, V14, P218, DOI 10.1027//0269-8803.14.4.218; Holroyd CB, 1998, NEUROSCI LETT, V242, P65, DOI 10.1016/S0304-3940(98)00035-4; JENKINS IH, 1994, J NEUROSCI, V14, P3775; JENNINGS JR, 1992, J EXP PSYCHOL HUMAN, V18, P422, DOI 10.1037/0096-1523.18.2.422; JODO E, 1992, ELECTROEN CLIN NEURO, V82, P477, DOI 10.1016/0013-4694(92)90054-L; KALASKA JF, 1995, CEREB CORTEX, V5, P410, DOI 10.1093/cercor/5.5.410; Kiefer M, 1998, NEUROREPORT, V9, P765, DOI 10.1097/00001756-199803090-00037; Kiehl KA, 2001, J PSYCHOPHYSIOL, V15, P221, DOI 10.1027//0269-8803.15.4.221; Kiehl KA, 2000, PSYCHOPHYSIOLOGY, V37, P216, DOI 10.1017/S0048577200990231; KOK A, 2002, IN PRESS 42 ANN M SO, pS48; KOK A, 1983, 7 INT C EV REL POT B; KOK A, 1986, BIOL PSYCHOL, V23, P21, DOI 10.1016/0301-0511(86)90087-6; KOK A, 1988, BIOL PSYCHOL, V27, P51, DOI 10.1016/0301-0511(88)90005-1; Kok A, 1999, ACTA PSYCHOL, V101, P129, DOI 10.1016/S0001-6918(99)00003-7; Kopp B, 1996, ELECTROEN CLIN NEURO, V99, P19, DOI 10.1016/0921-884X(96)95617-9; Kopp B, 1996, PSYCHOPHYSIOLOGY, V33, P282, DOI 10.1111/j.1469-8986.1996.tb00425.x; Logan G. D., 1995, INHIBITORY PROCESSES, P189; LOGAN GD, 1984, J EXPT PSYCHOL HUMAN, V10, P275; LOGAN GD, 1984, PSYCHOL REV, V91, P295, DOI 10.1037//0033-295X.91.3.295; McCarthy G, 1997, J NEUROPHYSIOL, V77, P1630; Menon V, 1997, NEUROREPORT, V8, P3029, DOI 10.1097/00001756-199709290-00007; Menon V, 2001, HUM BRAIN MAPP, V12, P131, DOI 10.1002/1097-0193(200103)12:3<131::AID-HBM1010>3.0.CO;2-C; Meyer DE, 1997, PSYCHOL REV, V104, P3, DOI 10.1037//0033-295X.104.1.3; Miller EK, 2001, ANNU REV NEUROSCI, V24, P167, DOI 10.1146/annurev.neuro.24.1.167; MUSHIAKE H, 1991, J NEUROPHYSIOL, V66, P705; Nieuwenhuis S, 2001, PSYCHOPHYSIOLOGY, V38, P752, DOI 10.1017/S0048577201001111; OSMAN A, 1986, J EXP PSYCHOL HUMAN, V12, P243, DOI 10.1037/0096-1523.12.3.243; PFEFFERBAUM A, 1985, ELECTROEN CLIN NEURO, V60, P423, DOI 10.1016/0013-4694(85)91017-X; PFEFFERBAUM A, 1988, ELECTROEN CLIN NEURO, V71, P55, DOI 10.1016/0168-5597(88)90019-6; Pliszka SR, 2000, BIOL PSYCHIAT, V48, P238, DOI 10.1016/S0006-3223(00)00890-8; Ridderinkhof KR, 1999, ACTA PSYCHOL, V101, P315; Ridderinkhof KR, 2002, PSYCHOL RES-PSYCH FO, V66, P312, DOI 10.1007/s00426-002-0104-7; ROBERTS LE, 1994, ELECTROEN CLIN NEURO, V92, P44, DOI 10.1016/0168-5597(94)90006-X; Rubia K, 2001, NEUROIMAGE, V13, P250, DOI 10.1006/nimg.2000.0685; Ruchkin DS, 1978, MULTIDISCIPLINARY PE, P579; SASAKI K, 1989, BRAIN RES, V495, P100, DOI 10.1016/0006-8993(89)91222-5; SASAKI K, 1993, NEUROSCI RES, V18, P249, DOI 10.1016/0168-0102(93)90062-U; Scheffers MK, 1996, PSYCHOPHYSIOLOGY, V33, P42, DOI 10.1111/j.1469-8986.1996.tb02107.x; SCHERG M, 1996, BESA BRAIN ELECT SOU; Tekok-Kilic A, 2001, PSYCHOPHYSIOLOGY, V38, P578, DOI 10.1017/S0048577201991279; van Boxtel GJM, 2001, BIOL PSYCHOL, V58, P229, DOI 10.1016/S0301-0511(01)00117-X; Watanabe J, 2002, NEUROIMAGE, V17, P1207, DOI 10.1006/nimg.2002.1198; WOESTENBURG JC, 1983, BIOL PSYCHOL, V16, P127, DOI 10.1016/0301-0511(83)90059-5
Number of Citaion: 58
Publication: BLACKWELL PUBLISHING LTD
City of Publication: OXFORD
Address of Publication: 9600 GARSINGTON RD, OXFORD OX4 2DG, OXON, ENGLAND
ISSN: 0048-5772
29-Character Source Abbreviation: PSYCHOPHYSIOLOGY
ISO Source Abbreviation: Psychophysiology
Volume: 41
Version: 1
Start of File: 9
End of File: 20
DOI: 10.1046/j.1469-8986.2003.00127.x
Number of Pages: 12
Web of Science Category: Psychology, Biological; Neurosciences; Physiology; Psychology; Psychology, Experimental
Subject Category: Psychology; Neurosciences & Neurology; Physiology
Document Delivery Number: 768WJ
Unique Article Identifier: WOS:000188592900002
[이 게시물은 HyeJung Mo…님에 의해 2015-05-20 20:19:19 GAMBLING에서 이동 됨]
- reply : 0
-
- list
-
- prev
- next