±â¼ú¡¤¾Ë°í¸®Áò | Cases and Studies of Technology & Algorithm in Lottery & Gambling | Ðü术 & ß©Ûö
- Article] ERP correlates of feedback and reward processing in the presence and absence of response choice
-
DocNo of ILP: 5229
Doc. Type: Article
Title: ERP correlates of feedback and reward processing in the presence and absence of response choice
Authors: Yeung, N; Holroyd, CB; Cohen, JD
Full Name of Authors: Yeung, N; Holroyd, CB; Cohen, JD
Keywords by Author: anterior cingulate cortex; error-related negativity; ERN; evaluation; medial frontal negativity; P300
Keywords Plus: ANTERIOR CINGULATE CORTEX; MEDIAL FRONTAL-CORTEX; ERROR-DETECTION; NEURAL SYSTEM; HUMAN BRAIN; TASK; PERFORMANCE; POTENTIALS; NEGATIVITY; PREDICTION
Abstract: The feedback negativity is a component of the event-related brain potential that is elicited by feedback stimuli associated with unfavorable outcomes. The present research investigated whether this component reflects an evaluation of the valence of experienced outcomes or a process of learning about actions that led to those outcomes. The latter hypothesis predicts that the feedback negativity should be observed only when negative outcomes are experienced in relation to executed actions. Contrary to this prediction, feedback negativities were observed in simple monetary gambling tasks in which participants made no active choices (experiment 1) and no overt actions (experiment 2). However, the amplitude of the component was reduced in these tasks relative to a gambling task in which the outcomes appeared to be contingent upon participants' response choices. This reduction was correlated with changes in participants' subjective ratings of involvement in the tasks, suggesting that the evaluative process indexed by the feedback negativity is sensitive to the motivational significance of ongoing events.
Cate of OECD: Basic medicine
Year of Publication: 2005
Business Area: gamble
Detail Business: gamble
Country: USA
Study Area:
Name of Journal: CEREBRAL CORTEX
Language: English
Country of Authors: Princeton Univ, Dept Psychol, Princeton, NJ 08544 USA; Univ Pittsburgh, Dept Psychiat, Pittsburgh, PA 15213 USA
Press Adress: Yeung, N (reprint author), Carnegie Mellon Univ, Dept Psychol, Pittsburgh, PA 15213 USA.
Email Address: nyeung@cmu.edu
Citaion:
Funding:
Lists of Citation: Botvinick MM, 2001, PSYCHOL REV, V108, P624, DOI 10.1037//0033-295X.108.3.624; Bush G, 2000, TRENDS COGN SCI, V4, P215, DOI 10.1016/S1364-6613(00)01483-2; Bush G, 2002, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V99, P523, DOI 10.1073/pnas.012470999; Carter CS, 1998, SCIENCE, V280, P747, DOI 10.1126/science.280.5364.747; Coles M. G. H., 1988, BEHAVIORAL BRAIN SCI, V11, P355; Coles MG, 2004, COGNITIVE NEUROSCIEN, P219; Crino P. B., 1993, NEUROBIOLOGY CINGULA, P285; Delgado M. R., 2003, Cognitive Affective & Behavioral Neuroscience, V3, P27, DOI 10.3758/CABN.3.1.27; Delgado MR, 2000, J NEUROPHYSIOL, V84, P3072; DEVINSKY O, 1995, BRAIN, V118, P279, DOI 10.1093/brain/118.1.279; Dum R., 1993, NEUROBIOLOGY CINGULA, P415; Falkenstein M., 1990, PSYCHOPHYSIOLOGICAL, P192; Gehring WJ, 2002, SCIENCE, V295, P2279, DOI 10.1126/science.1066893; GEHRING WJ, 1993, PSYCHOL SCI, V4, P385, DOI 10.1111/j.1467-9280.1993.tb00586.x; GRATTON G, 1983, ELECTROEN CLIN NEURO, V55, P468, DOI 10.1016/0013-4694(83)90135-9; Holroyd CB, 2004, PSYCHOPHYSIOLOGY, V41, P245, DOI 10.1111/j.1469-8986.2004.00152.x; Holroyd CB, 2003, NEUROREPORT, V14, P2481, DOI 10.1097/01.wnr.0000099601/41403.a5; Holroyd CB, 2004, NAT NEUROSCI, V7, P497, DOI 10.1038/nn1238; Holroyd CB, 2002, PSYCHOL REV, V109, P679, DOI 10.1037//0033-295X.109.4.679; Ito S, 2003, SCIENCE, V302, P120, DOI 10.1126/science.1087847; Ito TA, 1998, J PERS SOC PSYCHOL, V75, P887, DOI 10.1037//0022-3514.75.4.887; Knutson B, 2000, NEUROIMAGE, V12, P20, DOI 10.1006/nimg.2000.0593; Koski L, 2000, EXP BRAIN RES, V133, P55, DOI 10.1007/s002210000400; KUTAS M, 1977, SCIENCE, V197, P792, DOI 10.1126/science.887923; Luu P, 2003, PSYCHOL SCI, V14, P47, DOI 10.1111/1467-9280.01417; Miltner WHR, 1997, J COGNITIVE NEUROSCI, V9, P788, DOI 10.1162/jocn.1997.9.6.788; Monchi O, 2001, J NEUROSCI, V21, P7733; Morecraft RJ, 1998, BRAIN RES BULL, V45, P209, DOI 10.1016/S0361-9230(97)00344-4; Nieuwenhuis S, 2004, CEREB CORTEX, V14, P741, DOI 10.1093/cercor/bhh034; Nieuwenhuis Sander, 2002, Cognitive Affective and Behavioral Neuroscience, V2, P19, DOI 10.3758/CABN.2.1.19; NIKI H, 1979, BRAIN RES, V171, P213, DOI 10.1016/0006-8993(79)90328-7; PAUS T, 1993, J NEUROPHYSIOL, V70, P453; Paus T, 2001, NAT REV NEUROSCI, V2, P417, DOI 10.1038/35077500; Picard N, 2001, CURR OPIN NEUROBIOL, V11, P663, DOI 10.1016/S0959-4388(01)00266-5; Picard N, 1996, CEREB CORTEX, V6, P342, DOI 10.1093/cercor/6.3.342; POSNER MI, 1990, ANNU REV NEUROSCI, V13, P25, DOI 10.1146/annurev.neuro.13.1.25; Ruchsow M, 2002, NEUROSCI LETT, V325, P203, DOI 10.1016/S0304-3940(02)00288-4; Schultz W, 1997, SCIENCE, V275, P1593, DOI 10.1126/science.275.5306.1593; Shima K, 1998, SCIENCE, V282, P1335, DOI 10.1126/science.282.5392.1335; Sutton R., 1998, REINFORCEMENT LEARNI; Ullsperger M, 2003, J NEUROSCI, V23, P4308; Van Hoesen GW, 1993, NEUROBIOLOGY CINGULA, P249; YEUNG N, 2004, IN PRESS PSYCHOL REV; Yeung N., 2004, ERRORS CONFLICTS BRA, P63; Yeung N, 2004, J NEUROSCI, V24, P6258, DOI 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4537-03.2004
Number of Citaion: 45
Publication: OXFORD UNIV PRESS INC
City of Publication: CARY
Address of Publication: JOURNALS DEPT, 2001 EVANS RD, CARY, NC 27513 USA
ISSN: 1047-3211
29-Character Source Abbreviation: CEREB CORTEX
ISO Source Abbreviation: Cereb. Cortex
Volume: 15
Version: 5
Start of File: 535
End of File: 544
DOI: 10.1093/cercor/bhh153
Number of Pages: 10
Web of Science Category: Neurosciences
Subject Category: Neurosciences & Neurology
Document Delivery Number: 919RT
Unique Article Identifier: WOS:000228636000006
[ÀÌ °Ô½Ã¹°Àº HyeJung Mo¡¦´Ô¿¡ ÀÇÇØ 2015-05-20 20:19:19 GAMBLING¿¡¼ À̵¿ µÊ]
- reply : 0
-
- list
-
- prev
- next