• HOME
    KOREAN
    CHINESS
    SITE MAP
    JOIN
  • Username (Site Login ID)
  • Password
  • Forgot your password?

  • ±â¼ú¡¤¾Ë°í¸®Áò | Cases and Studies of Technology & Algorithm in Lottery & Gambling | Ðü术 & ß©Ûö

    date : 2015-05-20 01:10|hit : 2147
    Review] Impacts of nutritional technology on feeds offered to horses: A review of effects of processing on voluntary intake, digesta characteristics and feed utilisation
    DocNo of ILP: 4096

    Doc. Type: Review

    Title: Impacts of nutritional technology on feeds offered to horses: A review of effects of processing on voluntary intake, digesta characteristics and feed utilisation

    Authors: Hill, J

    Full Name of Authors: Hill, J.

    Keywords by Author: feed processing; horses; voluntary intake; digestibility; passage rate; post ingestive effects

    Keywords Plus: PELLETED HAY RATHER; STABLED HORSES; AD-LIBITUM; STEREOTYPIC BEHAVIOR; FUSARIUM MYCOTOXINS; INGESTIVE BEHAVIOR; FORAGING BEHAVIOR; LARGE-INTESTINE; DIET SELECTION; CHOPPED HAY

    Abstract: Advances in feed processing technology applied to diet systems for ruminant livestock have been used extensively in the equine feed industry. The translation of these technologies is an important area of interest for the feed processing industry servicing the various sectors of the equine industry such as feeds for the racing, meat, milk and urine production, as well as supplements for leisure horse use. However, there are few reviews examining impacts of feed processing technologies on the processes controlling voluntary intake or utilisation of processed feeds by horses. In this paper, some of the specific features of feeds and impacts of feed processing on factors controlling meal pattern, frequency and size, and digestive physiology will be addressed. Three main areas are examined in this review, being impacts of feed processing on processes of "information gathering" (sensory and nutritional knowledge) by the horse, eating behaviour of the horse offered processed feeds (notably issues of preference and control of short-term ingestion rate), and implications of constraints of digestive physiology, process and function on voluntary intake and digestibility of processed feeds. The review highlights areas of future research and development for nutritional technology to increase knowledge of interactions between equine physiology and feed processing to enhance efficiency of capture of nutrients and maintain the welfare of horses managed in the housed environment. (C) 2007 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

    Cate of OECD: Animal and dairy science

    Year of Publication: 2007

    Business Area: other

    Detail Business: medicine & science

    Country: Netherlands

    Study Area:

    Name of Journal: ANIMAL FEED SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY

    Language: English

    Country of Authors: Univ Melbourne, Fac Land & Food Resources, Parkville, Vic 3010, Australia

    Press Adress: Hill, J (reprint author), Univ Melbourne, Fac Land & Food Resources, Parkville, Vic 3010, Australia.

    Email Address: julianh@unimelb.edu.au

    Citaion:

    Funding:

    Lists of Citation: Argo CM, 2002, ANIM SCI, V74, P517; Bach Knudsen K. E., 2001, Animal Feed Science and Technology, V90, P3, DOI 10.1016/S0377-8401(01)00193-6; Bailey SR, 2002, J ANIM SCI, V80, P2656; BENNETT DK, 1980, SYST ZOOL, V29, P272, DOI 10.2307/2412662; Buckley T. C., 2003, Nutritional biotechnology in the feed and food industries. Proceedings of Alltech's 19th Annual Symposium. Beyond the tornado: natural technologies, the calm before the storm, Lexington, Kentucky, USA, 11-14 May 2003, P433; Cairns MC, 2002, ANIM SCI, V75, P257; CHAMBERS ARM, 1981, GRASS FORAGE SCI, V36, P97, DOI 10.1111/j.1365-2494.1981.tb01545.x; CHENOST M, 1986, ANN ZOOTECH, V35, P1, DOI 10.1051/animres:19860101; Cooper JJ, 2005, APPL ANIM BEHAV SCI, V90, P351, DOI 10.1016/j.applanim.2004.08.005; Cooper J.J., 1998, EQUINE VET J S, V27, P5; CUDDEFORD D, 2002, 1 EUR WORKSH EQ NUTR; CUDDEFORD D, 1992, EQUINE VET J, V24, P84; CYMBALUK NF, 1989, J ANIM SCI, V67, P414; Day JEL, 1998, NUTR RES REV, V11, P25, DOI 10.1079/NRR19980004; Dearing MD, 2005, ANNU REV ECOL EVOL S, V36, P169, DOI 10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.36.102003.152617; DEBOEVER JL, 1990, ANIM FEED SCI TECH, V27, P281, DOI 10.1016/0377-8401(90)90143-V; de Castro JM, 2000, PHYSIOL BEHAV, V70, P343, DOI 10.1016/S0031-9384(00)00264-X; DOREAU M, 1978, ANN ZOOTECH, V27, P291, DOI 10.1051/animres:19780301; Drogoul C, 2000, ANIM FEED SCI TECH, V87, P131, DOI 10.1016/S0377-8401(00)00188-7; Drogoul C, 2000, ANIM FEED SCI TECH, V87, P117, DOI 10.1016/S0377-8401(00)00187-5; Dulphy JP, 1997, LIVEST PROD SCI, V52, P97, DOI 10.1016/S0301-6226(97)00145-0; Dulphy JP, 1997, LIVEST PROD SCI, V52, P49, DOI 10.1016/S0301-6226(97)00113-9; Ellis AD, 2005, NUTR PHYSL HORSE; FAICHNEY GJ, 1993, QUANTITATIVE ASPECTS; Forbes J M, 1988, Nutr Res Rev, V1, P145, DOI 10.1079/NRR19880012; FOWLER ME, 1983, J WILDLIFE DIS, V19, P34; Galef B. G., 1996, SOCIAL LEARNING ANIM; GARNER HE, 1975, AM J VET RES, V36, P441; GLENDINNING JI, 1994, PHYSIOL BEHAV, V56, P1217, DOI 10.1016/0031-9384(94)90369-7; GOODSON J, 1988, APPL ENVIRON MICROB, V54, P1946; Goodwin D, 2005, APPL ANIM BEHAV SCI, V90, P337, DOI 10.1016/j.applanim.2004.08.013; GOODWIN D, 2005, APPL ANIM BEHAV SCI, V90, P223; GREENHALGH JFD, 1982, HERBAGE INTAKE HDB; Haccou P., 1992, STAT ANAL BEHAV DATA; Hill J, 2002, LIVEST PROD SCI, V75, P209, DOI 10.1016/S0301-6226(01)00304-9; HINKLE DK, 1983, P 8 EQ NUTR PHYSL S, P223; HINTZ HF, 1966, J ANIM SCI, V25, P1059; HOUPT KA, 1995, EQUINE VET J, V27, P82; HOUPT KA, 1988, J ANIM SCI, V66, P2159; HOUPT KA, 1990, VET CLIN N AM-EQUINE, V6, P319; HOUPT KA, 1990, J ANIM SCI, V68, P2340; Jose-Cunilleras E, 2004, J ANIM SCI, V82, P2623; KALUEFF AV, 2000, P 3 INT C METH TECHN, P178; Kennedy M.A.P., 1999, P KER NUTR C, P70; KERN D, 1972, J ANIM SCI, V35, P285; KIENZLE E, 1992, PRAEILEALE STARKEVER; KRONFELD DS, 2005, J ANIM SCI S, V83, pD22; LAUNCHBAUGH KL, 1995, SYMPOSIUM: INTAKE BY FEEDLOT CATTLE, P36; LAUT JE, 1985, PHYSIOL BEHAV, V35, P549, DOI 10.1016/0031-9384(85)90139-8; LAWRENCE LM, 1994, ATHLETIC HORSE PRINC; Lowman RS, 2002, ANIM FEED SCI TECH, V97, P221, DOI 10.1016/S0377-8401(02)00019-6; LUCAS PW, 1990, FUNCT ECOL, V4, P819, DOI 10.2307/2389448; Richards N., 2003, Nutritional biotechnology in the feed and food industries. Proceedings of Alltech's 19th Annual Symposium. Beyond the tornado: natural technologies, the calm before the storm, Lexington, Kentucky, USA, 11-14 May 2003, P461; MAL ME, 1994, APPL ANIM BEHAV SCI, V40, P187, DOI 10.1016/0168-1591(94)90060-4; MCGREEVY PD, 1998, EQUINE VET J SUPPL, V28, P20; McLean BML, 2000, ANIM FEED SCI TECH, V85, P79, DOI 10.1016/S0377-8401(00)00132-2; Medina B, 2002, J ANIM SCI, V80, P2600; MERTENS DR, 1993, QUANTITATIVE ASPECTS; MEYER H, 1980, DEUT TIERARZTL WOCH, V87, P43; MEYER H, 1993, P 13 EQ NUTR PHYS S, P92; Meyer H, 1975, Dtsch Tierarztl Wochenschr, V82, P54; MILLS DS, 1998, EQUINE VET J SUPPL, V27, P47; MILNE EM, 1990, VET REC, V126, P502; MOSELEY G, 1998, P 16 INT GRASSL C IG, P789; MURRAY MJ, 1996, EQUINE VET J, V28, P347; Nankervis K., 1999, EQUINE BEHAV PRINCIP; National Research Council, 1989, NUTR REQ HORS; Naujeck A, 2003, ANIM SCI, V77, P95; NAUJECK A, 2004, APPL ANIM BEHAV SCI, V90, P49; OEHME FW, 1987, CURRENT THERAPY EQUI, V2, P672; OWEN JB, 1992, J AGR SCI, V119, P151; PFISTER JA, 1999, WILDLIFE RANGE EXP S, V70; Prache S, 1998, ANN ZOOTECH, V47, P335, DOI 10.1051/animres:19980502; Provenza FD, 1998, NUTR RES REV, V11, P199, DOI 10.1079/NRR19980015; PROVENZA FD, 1992, J RANGE MANAGE, V45, P36, DOI 10.2307/4002523; Provenza FD, 2003, SMALL RUMINANT RES, V49, P257, DOI 10.1016/S0921-4488(03)00143-3; PYKE GH, 1984, ANNU REV ECOL SYST, V15, P523, DOI 10.1146/annurev.es.15.110184.002515; Ralphs MH, 1999, P NUTR SOC, V58, P813, DOI 10.1017/S002966519900110X; RALSTON SL, 1982, J ANIM SCI, V54, P1132; RALSTON SL, 1983, J ANIM SCI, V57, P815; RALSTON SL, 1982, J ANIM SCI, V55, P243; RALSTON SL, 1979, J ANIM SCI, V49, P838; RALSTON SL, 1984, J ANIM SCI, V59, P1354; Ramos AJ, 1996, J FOOD PROTECT, V59, P631; RANDALL RP, 1978, J ANIM SCI, V47, P51; Raymond SL, 2003, J ANIM SCI, V81, P2123; Raymond SL, 2005, J ANIM SCI, V83, P1267; Reeves MJ, 1996, PREV VET MED, V26, P285, DOI 10.1016/0167-5877(95)00551-X; RODGERS AR, 1988, CAN J ZOOL, V68, P188; ROSS CA, 1999, MODERN NUTR HLTH DIS, P305; Rowe J.B., 1994, J NUTR, V124, p2742S; RUCKEBUSCH Y, 1988, J VET PHARMACOL THER, V11, P389; Rutter SM, 2000, BEHAV RES METH INS C, V32, P86, DOI 10.3758/BF03200791; Sauvant D, 1996, J ANIM SCI, V74, P2785; Sneddon JC, 1998, J ARID ENVIRON, V38, P493, DOI 10.1006/jare.1997.0354; THORHALLSDOTTIR AG, 1990, APPL ANIM BEHAV SCI, V25, P25, DOI 10.1016/0168-1591(90)90066-M; THORNE JB, 2003, 37 INT C ISAE AB TER, P100; TODD LK, 1994, J ANIMAL PHYSL, V73, P1; TODD LK, 1995, J ANIM PHYSIOL AN N, V73, P140; UDEN P, 1982, ANIM FEED SCI TECH, V7, P35, DOI 10.1016/0377-8401(82)90034-7; vanWieren SE, 1996, FOREST ECOL MANAG, V88, P149, DOI 10.1016/S0378-1127(96)03877-7; VINCENT JFV, 1990, ADV BOT RES, V17, P235; WARING GH, 2002, HORSE BEHAV BEHAV TR; WOLTER R, 1979, REV MED VET-TOULOUSE, V130, P1345; WOLTER R, 1974, ANN ZOOTECH, V23, P293, DOI 10.1051/animres:19740304

    Number of Citaion: 105

    Publication: ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV

    City of Publication: AMSTERDAM

    Address of Publication: PO BOX 211, 1000 AE AMSTERDAM, NETHERLANDS

    ISSN: 0377-8401

    29-Character Source Abbreviation: ANIM FEED SCI TECH

    ISO Source Abbreviation: Anim. Feed Sci. Technol.

    Volume: 138

    Version: 2

    Start of File: 92

    End of File: 117

    DOI: 10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2007.06.018

    Number of Pages: 26

    Web of Science Category: Agriculture, Dairy & Animal Science

    Subject Category: Agriculture

    Document Delivery Number: 227CP

    Unique Article Identifier: WOS:000250635100002

    [ÀÌ °Ô½Ã¹°Àº HyeJung Mo¡¦´Ô¿¡ ÀÇÇØ 2015-05-20 15:55:01 GAMBLING¿¡¼­ À̵¿ µÊ]
    reply : 0
  • list
  • prev
  • next