• HOME
    KOREAN
    CHINESS
    SITE MAP
    JOIN
  • Username (Site Login ID)
  • Password
  • Forgot your password?

  • º¸¾È¡¤±ÔÁ¦ | Cases and Studies of Security & Regulation in Lottery & Gambling | ÜÁäÌ & ùÚð¤

    date : 2015-05-20 01:10|hit : 1817
    Article] Security and potential level preferences with thresholds
    DocNo of ILP: 4119

    Doc. Type: Article

    Title: Security and potential level preferences with thresholds

    Authors: Schmidt, U; Zimper, A

    Full Name of Authors: Schmidt, Ulrich; Zimper, Alexander

    Keywords by Author: Allais paradoxes; security level; potential level; thresholds

    Keywords Plus: EXPECTED-UTILITY; AXIOMATIC MODEL; PROSPECT-THEORY; RISK; DECISION; CHOICE; INDEPENDENCE; EQUILIBRIUM; UNCERTAINTY; CERTAINTY

    Abstract: The security level models of Gilboa [1988. A combination of expected utility and maxmin decision criteria. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 32, 405-420] and of Jaffray [1988. Choice under risk and the security factor: An axiomatic model. Theory and Decision, 24, 169-200] as well as the security and potential level model of Cohen [1992. Security level, potential level, expected utility: A three-criteria decision model under risk. Theory and Decision, 33, 101-104] and Essid [1997. Choice under risk with certainty and potential effects: A general axiomatic model. Mathematical Social Sciences, 34, 223-247] successfully accommodate classical Allais paradoxes while they offer an interesting explanation for their occurrence. However, experimental data suggest a systematic violation of these models when lotteries with low probabilities of bad or good outcomes are involved. In our opinion, one promising candidate for the explanation of these violations is the assumption of thresholds in the perception of security and potential levels. The present paper develops an axiomatic model that allows for such thresholds, so that the derived representation of preferences can accommodate the observed violations of the original security and potential level models. (C) 2007 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

    Cate of OECD: Mathematics

    Year of Publication: 2007

    Business Area: lottery

    Detail Business: lottery

    Country: USA

    Study Area:

    Name of Journal: JOURNAL OF MATHEMATICAL PSYCHOLOGY

    Language: English

    Country of Authors: Univ Cape Town, Sch Econ, ZA-7701 Cape Town, South Africa; Leibniz Univ Hannover, Lehrstuhl Finanzmarkttheorie, D-30167 Hannover, Germany

    Press Adress: Zimper, A (reprint author), Univ Cape Town, Sch Econ, ZA-7701 Cape Town, South Africa.

    Email Address: u.schmidt@mbox.vwl.uni-hannover.de; zimper@bigfoot.com

    Citaion:

    Funding:

    Lists of Citation: ALLAIS M, 1979, EXPECTD UTILITY HYPO; Birnbaum MH, 1998, J RISK UNCERTAINTY, V17, P49, DOI 10.1023/A:1007739200913; CHATEAUNEUF A, 2004, 0310 U MANNH; COHEN M, 1992, THEOR DECIS, V33, P101, DOI 10.1007/BF00134092; CRAWFORD VP, 1990, J ECON THEORY, V50, P127, DOI 10.1016/0022-0531(90)90088-2; DOW J, 1994, J ECON THEORY, V64, P305, DOI 10.1006/jeth.1994.1071; Eichberger J, 1999, THEOR DECIS, V46, P107, DOI 10.1023/A:1004994630014; Essid S, 1997, MATH SOC SCI, V34, P223, DOI 10.1016/S0165-4896(97)00011-5; FISHBURN P., 1988, NONLINEAR PREFERENCE; GILBOA I, 1988, J MATH PSYCHOL, V32, P405, DOI 10.1016/0022-2496(88)90020-X; HARLESS DW, 1994, ECONOMETRICA, V62, P1251, DOI 10.2307/2951749; JAFFRAY JY, 1988, THEOR DECIS, V24, P169, DOI 10.1007/BF00132460; KAHNEMAN D, 1979, ECONOMETRICA, V47, P263, DOI 10.2307/1914185; Karni Edi, 1991, HDB MATH EC, V4, P1763, DOI 10.1016/S1573-4382(05)80008-6; LOPES LL, 1987, ADV EXP SOC PSYCHOL, V20, P255, DOI 10.1016/S0065-2601(08)60416-5; Rabin M, 2000, ECONOMETRICA, V68, P1281, DOI 10.1111/1468-0262.00158; SAFRA Z, 2005, UNPUB ARE UNIVERSAL; SAFRA Z, 2006, UNPUB CALIBRATION RE; Schmidt U, 2000, ECON LETT, V67, P29, DOI 10.1016/S0165-1765(99)00247-5; SCHMIDT U, 2004, HDB UTILITY THEORY, V2; Sjoberg L., 2000, J RISK RES, V3, P287, DOI 10.1080/13669870050043189; Sjoberg L, 1999, J RISK RES, V2, P129, DOI 10.1080/136698799376899; Starmer C, 2000, J ECON LIT, V38, P332, DOI 10.1257/jel.38.2.332; STONE ER, 1994, ORGAN BEHAV HUM DEC, V60, P387, DOI 10.1006/obhd.1994.1091; SUGDEN R, 2004, HDB UTILITY THEORY, V2; TVERSKY A, 1992, J RISK UNCERTAINTY, V5, P297, DOI 10.1007/BF00122574; ZIMPER A, 2007, IN PRESS THEORY DECI

    Number of Citaion: 27

    Publication: ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE

    City of Publication: SAN DIEGO

    Address of Publication: 525 B ST, STE 1900, SAN DIEGO, CA 92101-4495 USA

    ISSN: 0022-2496

    29-Character Source Abbreviation: J MATH PSYCHOL

    ISO Source Abbreviation: J. Math. Psychol.

    Volume: 51

    Version: 5

    Start of File: 279

    End of File: 289

    DOI: 10.1016/j.jmp.2007.05.001

    Number of Pages: 11

    Web of Science Category: Mathematics, Interdisciplinary Applications; Social Sciences, Mathematical Methods; Psychology, Mathematical

    Subject Category: Mathematics; Mathematical Methods In Social Sciences; Psychology

    Document Delivery Number: 231TB

    Unique Article Identifier: WOS:000250970800001

    [ÀÌ °Ô½Ã¹°Àº HyeJung Mo¡¦´Ô¿¡ ÀÇÇØ 2015-05-20 15:48:54 GAMBLING¿¡¼­ À̵¿ µÊ]
    reply : 0
  • list
  • prev
  • next