• HOME
    KOREAN
    CHINESS
    SITE MAP
    JOIN
  • Username (Site Login ID)
  • Password
  • Forgot your password?

  • °ÔÀÓ¼³°è | Cases and Studies of Game Design in Lottery & Gambling | êý戏设计

    date : 2015-05-20 01:10|hit : 1858
    Article] Inferring Conjunctive Probabilities From Noisy Samples: Evidence for the Configural Weighted Average Model
    DocNo of ILP: 230

    Doc. Type: Article

    Title: Inferring Conjunctive Probabilities From Noisy Samples: Evidence for the Configural Weighted Average Model

    Authors: Jenny, MA; Rieskamp, J; Nilsson, H

    Full Name of Authors: Jenny, Mirjam A.; Rieskamp, Joerg; Nilsson, Hakan

    Keywords by Author: probability judgment; conjunction fallacy; conjunctive probabilities; cognitive modeling; hierarchical Bayesian parameter estimation

    Keywords Plus: INFERENCE JUDGMENT; SIGNED SUMMATION; FALLACY; REPRESENTATIVENESS; DECISION; FORMATS; CHOICE; VALUES; ERRORS; RULES

    Abstract: Judging whether multiple events will co-occur is an important aspect of everyday decision making. The underlying probabilities of occurrence are usually unknown and have to be inferred from experience. Using a rigorous, quantitative model comparison, we investigate how people judge the conjunctive probabilities of multiple events to co-occur. In 2 experiments, participants had to repeatedly choose between pairs of 2 conjunctive events (represented as 2 gambles). To estimate the probability that both events occur, they had access to a small sample of information. The 1st experiment consisted of a balanced set of gambles, whereas in the 2nd experiment, the gambles were constructed such that the models maximally differed in their predictions. A hierarchical Bayesian approach used for estimating the models' parameters and for testing the models against each other showed that the majority of participants were best described by the configural weighted average model. This model performed best in predicting people's choices, and it assumes that constituent probabilities are ranked by importance, weighted accordingly, and added up. The cognitive modeling approach provides an understanding of the cognitive processes underlying people's conjunctive probability judgments.

    Cate of OECD: Psychology

    Year of Publication: 2014

    Business Area: gamble

    Detail Business: gamble

    Country: USA

    Study Area:

    Name of Journal: JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-LEARNING MEMORY AND COGNITION

    Language: English

    Country of Authors: [Jenny, Mirjam A.; Rieskamp, Joerg] Univ Basel, Dept Psychol, Basel, Switzerland; [Nilsson, Hakan] Uppsala Univ, Dept Psychol, Uppsala, Sweden

    Press Adress: Jenny, MA (reprint author), Max Planck Inst Human Dev, Ctr Adapt Rat, Lentzeallee 94, D-14195 Berlin, Germany.

    Email Address: jenny@mpib-berlin.mpg.de

    Citaion:

    Funding: Swiss National Science Foundation [100014_126721/1, 100014_138174/1]

    Lists of Citation: ABELSON RP, 1987, PERS SOC PSYCHOL B, V13, P141, DOI 10.1177/0146167287132001; Adamowicz W, 1998, AM J AGR ECON, V80, P64, DOI 10.2307/3180269; Anderson N., 1981, FDN INFORM INTEGRATI; Anderson N. H., 1996, FUNCTIONAL THEORY CO; [Anonymous], 2010, JUST ANOTHER GIBBS S; Bowers JS, 2012, PSYCHOL BULL, V138, P389, DOI 10.1037/a0026450; Costello FJ, 2009, J BEHAV DECIS MAKING, V22, P213, DOI 10.1002/bdm.618; CRANDALL CS, 1986, SOC COGNITION, V4, P408, DOI 10.1521/soco.1986.4.4.408; DAVIDSON D, 1995, MERRILL PALMER QUART, V41, P328; DULANY DE, 1991, SOC COGNITION, V9, P85, DOI 10.1521/soco.1991.9.1.85; Einhorn H. J., 1985, MODEL CONJUNCT UNPUB; Fantino E, 1997, PSYCHON B REV, V4, P96, DOI 10.3758/BF03210779; FIEDLER K, 1988, PSYCHOL RES-PSYCH FO, V50, P123, DOI 10.1007/BF00309212; Fisk JE, 1996, ACTA PSYCHOL, V94, P1, DOI 10.1016/0001-6918(95)00048-8; GAVANSKI I, 1991, J PERS SOC PSYCHOL, V61, P181, DOI 10.1037//0022-3514.61.2.181; Gigerenzer G, 1996, PSYCHOL REV, V103, P592, DOI 10.1037/0033-295X.103.3.592; GIGERENZER G, 1995, PSYCHOL REV, V102, P684, DOI 10.1037/0033-295X.102.4.684; Hertwig R, 2004, PSYCHOL SCI, V15, P534, DOI 10.1111/j.0956-7976.2004.00715.x; HOGARTH RM, 1992, COGNITIVE PSYCHOL, V24, P1, DOI 10.1016/0010-0285(92)90002-J; Jenny M. A., 2013, SIMILARITY UPD UNPUB; Juslin P, 2008, COGNITION, V106, P259, DOI 10.1016/j.cognition.2007.02.003; Juslin P, 2009, PSYCHOL REV, V116, P856, DOI 10.1037/a0016979; Juslin P, 2011, COGNITION, V120, P248, DOI 10.1016/j.cognition.2011.05.004; Koehler JJ, 1996, BEHAV BRAIN SCI, V19, P1; Kruschke J., 2011, DOING BAYESIAN DATA; Lagnado DA, 2002, COGNITION, V83, P81, DOI 10.1016/S0010-0277(01)00168-8; LOPES LL, 1985, B PSYCHONOMIC SOC, V23, P509; LOPES LL, 1987, ACTA PSYCHOL, V64, P167, DOI 10.1016/0001-6918(87)90005-9; Luce R. D., 1959, INDIVIDUAL CHOICE BE; Nilsson H, 2011, J MATH PSYCHOL, V55, P84, DOI 10.1016/j.jmp.2010.08.006; Nilsson H, 2013, FRONT PSYCHOL, V4, DOI 10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00101; Nilsson H, 2009, J EXP PSYCHOL GEN, V138, P517, DOI 10.1037/a0017351; Nilsson H, 2010, J ECON PSYCHOL, V31, P172, DOI 10.1016/j.joep.2009.07.003; Nilsson H, 2008, J BEHAV DECIS MAKING, V21, P471, DOI 10.1002/bdm.615; Raftery AE, 1995, SOCIOL METHODOL, V25, P111, DOI 10.2307/271063; Roussel JL, 2002, EUR J COGN PSYCHOL, V14, P61; Scheibehenne B, 2013, PSYCHOL REV, V120, P39, DOI 10.1037/a0030777; SHANTEAU J, 1975, ACTA PSYCHOL, V39, P83, DOI 10.1016/0001-6918(75)90023-2; SHANTEAU J, 1972, J EXP PSYCHOL, V93, P63, DOI 10.1037/h0032509; SHANTEAU JC, 1970, J EXP PSYCHOL, V85, P181, DOI 10.1037/h0029552; SIMON HA, 1990, ANNU REV PSYCHOL, V41, P1; Spiegelhalter DJ, 2002, J ROY STAT SOC B, V64, P583, DOI 10.1111/1467-9868.00353; Tentori K, 2013, J EXP PSYCHOL GEN, V142, P235, DOI 10.1037/a0028770; TVERSKY A, 1983, PSYCHOL REV, V90, P293, DOI 10.1037/0033-295X.90.4.293; von Sydow M, 2011, J MATH PSYCHOL, V55, P119, DOI 10.1016/j.jmp.2010.12.001; Wagenmakers EJ, 2007, PSYCHON B REV, V14, P779, DOI 10.3758/BF03194105; Wedell DH, 2008, COGNITION, V107, P105, DOI 10.1016/j.cognition.2007.08.003; WYER RS, 1976, ORGAN BEHAV HUM PERF, V15, P1, DOI 10.1016/0030-5073(76)90026-X; YATES JF, 1986, ORGAN BEHAV HUM DEC, V37, P230, DOI 10.1016/0749-5978(86)90053-1; Zizzo DJ, 2003, THEOR DECIS, V54, P287, DOI 10.1023/B:THEO.0000004350.81892.1b; Zizzo DJ, 2000, J ECON BEHAV ORGAN, V41, P263, DOI 10.1016/S0167-2681(99)00076-1

    Number of Citaion: 51

    Publication: AMER PSYCHOLOGICAL ASSOC

    City of Publication: WASHINGTON

    Address of Publication: 750 FIRST ST NE, WASHINGTON, DC 20002-4242 USA

    ISSN: 0278-7393

    29-Character Source Abbreviation: J EXP PSYCHOL LEARN

    ISO Source Abbreviation: J. Exp. Psychol.-Learn. Mem. Cogn.

    Volume: 40

    Version: 1

    Start of File: 203

    End of File: 217

    DOI: 10.1037/a0034261

    Number of Pages: 15

    Web of Science Category: Psychology; Psychology, Experimental

    Subject Category: Psychology

    Document Delivery Number: 280RX

    Unique Article Identifier: WOS:000329049600014

    [ÀÌ °Ô½Ã¹°Àº HyeJung Mo¡¦´Ô¿¡ ÀÇÇØ 2015-05-20 14:56:52 GAMBLING¿¡¼­ À̵¿ µÊ]
    reply : 0
  • list
  • prev
  • next