¿ì¼ö»ç·Ê | Best Practice and Cases in Lottery and Gambling | õÌÊ¢实践
- Article] Working memory involved in predicting future outcomes based on past experiences
-
DocNo of ILP: 3915
Doc. Type: Article
Title: Working memory involved in predicting future outcomes based on past experiences
Authors: Dretsch, MN; Tipples, J
Full Name of Authors: Dretsch, Michael N.; Tipples, Jason
Keywords by Author: decision making; working memory; Gambling Task; cognition; emotion; reward; punishment
Keywords Plus: SOMATIC MARKER HYPOTHESIS; VENTROMEDIAL PREFRONTAL CORTEX; IOWA GAMBLING TASK; DECISION-MAKING; DAMAGE; INDIVIDUALS; HUMANS; REWARD; LOAD
Abstract: Deficits in working memory have been shown to contribute to poor performance on the Iowa Gambling Task [IGT: Bechara, A., & Martin, E.M. (2004). Impaired decision making related to working memory deficits in individuals with substance addictions. Neuropsychology, 18, 152-162]. Similarly, a secondary memory load task has been shown to impair task performance [Hinson, J., Jameson, T. & Whitney, P. (2002). Somatic markers, working memory, and decision making. Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioural Neuroscience, 2, 341353]. In the present study, we investigate whether the latter findings were due to increased random responding [Franco-Watkins, A. M., Pashler, H., & Rickard, T. C. (2006). Does working memory load lead to greater impulsivity? Commentary on Hinson, Jameson, and Whitney's (2003). Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory & Cognition, 32, 443-447]. Participants were tested under Low Working Memory (LWM; n = 18) or High Working Memory (HWM; n = 17) conditions while performing the Reversed IGT in which punishment was immediate and reward delayed [Bechara, A., Dolan, S., & Hindes, A. (2002). Decision making and addiction (part 11): Myopia for the future or hypersensitivity to reward? Neuropsychologia, 40, 1690-1705]. In support of a role for working memory in emotional decision making, compared to the LWM condition, participants in the HWM condition made significantly greater number of disadvantageous selections than that predicted by chance. Performance by the HWM group could not be fully explained by random responding. (c) 2007 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Cate of OECD: Basic medicine
Year of Publication: 2008
Business Area: gamble
Detail Business: gamble
Country: USA
Study Area:
Name of Journal: BRAIN AND COGNITION
Language: English
Country of Authors: [Dretsch, Michael N.] Univ Wisconsin, Dept Psychol, Madison, WI 53706 USA; [Tipples, Jason] Univ Hull, Dept Psychol, Kingston Upon Hull HU6 7RX, N Humberside, England
Press Adress: Dretsch, MN (reprint author), Univ Wisconsin, Dept Psychol, 1202 W Johnson St, Madison, WI 53706 USA.
Email Address: dretsch@wisc.edu
Citaion:
Funding:
Lists of Citation: Bechara A, 1998, J NEUROSCI, V18, P428; Bechara A, 2004, NEUROPSYCHOLOGY, V18, P152, DOI 10.1037/0894-4105.18.1.152; Bechara A, 1996, CEREB CORTEX, V6, P215, DOI 10.1093/cercor/6.2.215; Bechara A, 2005, TRENDS COGN SCI, V9, P159, DOI 10.1016/j.tics.2005.02.002; Bechara A, 2002, NEUROPSYCHOLOGIA, V40, P1690, DOI 10.1016/S0028-3932(02)00016-7; Bechara A, 1999, J NEUROSCI, V19, P5473; Bechara A, 1997, SCIENCE, V275, P1293, DOI 10.1126/science.275.5304.1293; BECHARA A, 1994, COGNITION, V50, P7, DOI 10.1016/0010-0277(94)90018-3; Bechara A, 2000, BRAIN, V123, P2189, DOI 10.1093/brain/123.11.2189; Brunstrom JM, 2002, LEARN MOTIV, V33, P433, DOI 10.1016/S0023-9690(02)00007-3; Cavedini P, 2002, NEUROPSYCHOLOGIA, V40, P205, DOI 10.1016/S0028-3932(01)00077-X; Curtis CE, 2003, TRENDS COGN SCI, V7, P415, DOI 10.1016/S1364-6613(03)00197-9; Dunn BD, 2006, NEUROSCI BIOBEHAV R, V30, P239, DOI 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2005.07.001; Fellows LK, 2005, CEREB CORTEX, V15, P58, DOI 10.1093/cercor/bhh108; Fellows LK, 2005, NEUROPSYCHOLOGIA, V43, P1214, DOI 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2004.07.018; Franco-Watkins AM, 2006, J EXP PSYCHOL LEARN, V32, P443, DOI 10.1037/0278-7393.32.2.443; Franken IHA, 2005, PERS INDIV DIFFER, V39, P991, DOI 10.1016/j.paid.2005.04.004; Hinson John M., 2002, Cognitive Affective & Behavioral Neuroscience, V2, P341, DOI 10.3758/CABN.2.4.341; Hinson JM, 2006, J EXP PSYCHOL LEARN, V32, P448, DOI 10.1037/0278-7393.32.2.448; Hinson JM, 2003, J EXP PSYCHOL LEARN, V29, P298, DOI 10.1037/0278-7393.29.2.298; Hornak J, 2004, J COGNITIVE NEUROSCI, V16, P463, DOI 10.1162/089892904322926791; Jameson TL, 2004, PSYCHON B REV, V11, P515, DOI 10.3758/BF03196604; Losel F, 2004, J ABNORM PSYCHOL, V113, P522, DOI 10.1037/0021-843X.113.4.522; Maia TV, 2004, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V101, P16075, DOI 10.1073/pnas.0406666101; Manes F, 2002, BRAIN, V125, P624, DOI 10.1093/brain/awf049; Overman WH, 2004, BRAIN COGNITION, V55, P134, DOI 10.1016/s0278-2626(03)00279-3; Pecchinenda A, 2006, EXP PSYCHOL, V53, P191, DOI 10.1027/1618-3169.53.3.191; Rotheram-Fuller E, 2004, DRUG ALCOHOL DEPEN, V73, P79, DOI 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2003.10.003; Sanfey AG, 2003, NEUROPSYCHOLOGIA, V41, P1218, DOI 10.1016/S0028-3932(03)00039-3; Schmitt WA, 1999, J ABNORM PSYCHOL, V108, P538, DOI 10.1037/0021-843X.108.3.538; Turnbull OH, 2005, BRAIN COGNITION, V57, P244, DOI 10.1016/j.bandc.2004.08.053; Windmann S, 2006, J COGNITIVE NEUROSCI, V18, P1198, DOI 10.1162/jocn.2006.18.7.1198
Number of Citaion: 32
Publication: ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
City of Publication: SAN DIEGO
Address of Publication: 525 B ST, STE 1900, SAN DIEGO, CA 92101-4495 USA
ISSN: 0278-2626
29-Character Source Abbreviation: BRAIN COGNITION
ISO Source Abbreviation: Brain Cogn.
Volume: 66
Version: 1
Start of File: 83
End of File: 90
DOI: 10.1016/j.bandc.2007.05.006
Number of Pages: 8
Web of Science Category: Neurosciences; Psychology, Experimental
Subject Category: Neurosciences & Neurology; Psychology
Document Delivery Number: 267OK
Unique Article Identifier: WOS:000253518200010
[ÀÌ °Ô½Ã¹°Àº HyeJung Mo¡¦´Ô¿¡ ÀÇÇØ 2015-05-20 20:27:31 GAMBLING¿¡¼ À̵¿ µÊ]
- reply : 0
-
- list
-
- prev
- next