• HOME
    KOREAN
    CHINESS
    SITE MAP
    JOIN
  • Username (Site Login ID)
  • Password
  • Forgot your password?

  • Áßµ¶¡¤ºÎÀÛ¿ë | Cases and Studies of Addiction & Disorder in Lottery & Gambling | ñéÔ¸ & òðÜ»

    date : 2015-05-20 01:10|hit : 1899
    Article] Individual Health Discount Rate in Patients with Ulcerative Colitis
    DocNo of ILP: 1997

    Doc. Type: Article

    Title: Individual Health Discount Rate in Patients with Ulcerative Colitis

    Authors: Waljee, AK; Morris, AM; Waljee, JF; Higgins, PDR

    Full Name of Authors: Waljee, Akbar K.; Morris, Arden M.; Waljee, Jennifer F.; Higgins, Peter D. R.

    Keywords by Author: ulcerative colitis; discount rates; quality of life; utilities

    Keywords Plus: COST-EFFECTIVENESS ANALYSIS; INFLAMMATORY-BOWEL-DISEASE; CARE INTERVENTIONS; DECISION-MAKING; TIME PREFERENCE; TOBIT-MODEL; RISK; BENEFITS

    Abstract: Background: In cost-effectiveness analysis, discount rates are used in calculating the value of future costs and benefits. However, standard discount rates may not accurately describe the decision-making of patients with ulcerative colitis (UC). These patients often choose the long-term risks of immunosuppressive therapy over the short-term risks of colectomy, demonstrating very high discount rates for future health. In this study we aimed to measure the discount rate in UC patients and identify variables associated with the discount rate. Methods: We surveyed patients with UC and patients who were postcolectomy for UC to measure their valuations of UC and colectomy health states. We used Standard Gamble (SG) and Time-Trade-Off (TTO) methods to assess current and future health state valuations and calculated the discount rate. Results: Participants included 150 subjects with UC and 150 subjects who were postcolectomy for UC. Adjusted discount rates varied widely (0%-100%), with an overall median rate of 55.0% (interquartile range [IQR] 20.6-100), which was significantly higher than the standard rate of 5%. Within the normal range of discount rates, patients' expected discount rate increased by 0.80% for each additional year of age, and female patients had discount rates that averaged approximate to 8% less than their age-matched counterparts and approached statistical significance. Conclusions: The accepted discount rate of 5% grossly underestimates UC patients' preference for long-term over short-term risk. This might explain UC patients' frequent choice of the long-term risks of immunosuppressive medical therapy over the short-term risks of colectomy.

    Cate of OECD: Clinical medicine

    Year of Publication: 2011

    Business Area: gamble

    Detail Business: gamble

    Country: USA

    Study Area:

    Name of Journal: INFLAMMATORY BOWEL DISEASES

    Language: English

    Country of Authors: [Waljee, Akbar K.; Higgins, Peter D. R.] Univ Michigan, Dept Internal Med, Div Gastroenterol, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 USA; [Morris, Arden M.; Waljee, Jennifer F.] Univ Michigan, Dept Gen Surg, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 USA

    Press Adress: Waljee, AK (reprint author), Univ Michigan, Dept Internal Med, Div Gastroenterol, 6520 MSRB I,Box 0682,1150 W Med Ctr Dr, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 USA.

    Email Address: awaljee@med.umich.edu

    Citaion: Higgins, Peter/0000-0003-1602-4341; Waljee, Akbar/0000-0003-1964-8790;

    Funding: American Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons Limited [078]

    Lists of Citation: ARIAS E, 2006, US LIFE TABLES, P54; Austin PC, 2002, MED DECIS MAKING, V22, P152, DOI 10.1177/02729890222063035; Austin PC, 2000, QUAL LIFE RES, V9, P901, DOI 10.1023/A:1008938326604; Austin PC, 2002, VALUE HEALTH, V5, P329, DOI 10.1046/j.1524-4733.2002.54128.x; CAIRNS JA, 1994, HEALTH ECON, V3, P221, DOI 10.1002/hec.4730030404; Carter MJ, 2004, GUT, V53, DOI 10.1136/gut.2004.043372; Chapman GB, 1999, J EXP PSYCHOL-APPL, V5, P17, DOI 10.1037//1076-898X.5.1.17; CROPPER ML, 1992, AM ECON REV, V82, P469; Edwards A., 2001, QUAL HLTH CARE S1, V10, P9; FISHBURN PC, 1982, INT ECON REV, V23, P677, DOI 10.2307/2526382; Gold M, 1996, COST EFFECTIVENESS H; Smith DH, 2001, INT J TECHNOL ASSESS, V17, P236, DOI 10.1017/S0266462300105094; Gyrd-Hansen D, 2003, RISK ANAL, V23, P697, DOI 10.1111/1539-6924.00348; HEMBROFF LA, 2004, BMC MED INFORM DECIS, V16, P24; INGLE SB, 2007, RISK FACTORS ASS HOS; KRAHN M, 1993, MED CARE, V31, P403, DOI 10.1097/00005650-199305000-00003; LOEWENSTEIN G, 1992, Q J ECON, V107, P573, DOI 10.2307/2118482; Man-Son-Hing M, 1999, JAMA-J AM MED ASSOC, V282, P737, DOI 10.1001/jama.282.8.737; Olsen J A, 1993, Health Econ, V2, P257, DOI 10.1002/hec.4730020309; OLSEN JA, 1993, J HEALTH ECON, V12, P39, DOI 10.1016/0167-6296(93)90039-H; Ortendahl M, 2006, MED SCI MONITOR, V12, pRA41; Provenzale D, 1998, AM J GASTROENTEROL, V93, P872; Siegel C, 2008, INFLAMM BOWEL DIS, V14, P1, DOI 10.1002/ibd.20283; Waljee A, 2006, GUT, V55, P1575, DOI 10.1136/gut.2005.090316; WEINSTEIN MC, 1977, NEW ENGL J MED, V296, P716, DOI 10.1056/NEJM197703312961304; *WIK, COMP INT

    Number of Citaion: 26

    Publication: WILEY-BLACKWELL

    City of Publication: MALDEN

    Address of Publication: COMMERCE PLACE, 350 MAIN ST, MALDEN 02148, MA USA

    ISSN: 1078-0998

    29-Character Source Abbreviation: INFLAMM BOWEL DIS

    ISO Source Abbreviation: Inflamm. Bowel Dis.

    Volume: 17

    Version: 6

    Start of File: 1328

    End of File: 1332

    DOI: 10.1002/ibd.21515

    Number of Pages: 5

    Web of Science Category: Gastroenterology & Hepatology

    Subject Category: Gastroenterology & Hepatology

    Document Delivery Number: 761ZQ

    Unique Article Identifier: WOS:000290442400031

    [ÀÌ °Ô½Ã¹°Àº HyeJung Mo¡¦´Ô¿¡ ÀÇÇØ 2015-05-20 20:21:01 GAMBLING¿¡¼­ À̵¿ µÊ]
    reply : 0
  • list
  • prev
  • next