• HOME
    KOREAN
    CHINESS
    SITE MAP
    JOIN
  • Username (Site Login ID)
  • Password
  • Forgot your password?

  • Áßµ¶¡¤ºÎÀÛ¿ë | Cases and Studies of Addiction & Disorder in Lottery & Gambling | ñéÔ¸ & òðÜ»

    date : 2015-05-20 01:10|hit : 1908
    Article] Patient discomfort in bitewing examination with film and four digital receptors
    DocNo of ILP: 1352

    Doc. Type: Article

    Title: Patient discomfort in bitewing examination with film and four digital receptors

    Authors: Jorgensen, PM; Wenzel, A

    Full Name of Authors: Jorgensen, P. M.; Wenzel, A.

    Keywords by Author: radiography; dental; digital; bitewing examination; patient satisfaction; patient care

    Keywords Plus: DENTAL TREATMENT; STIMULI; SCALES; PAIN

    Abstract: The aim was to compare patient discomfort during bitewing examination using five intraoral receptors: a conventional film, a storage phosphor plate with a new soft cover, an already manufactured and sold sensor with a wire and two square and two rounded corners, a new version of a previously developed sensor with a wire and four square corners, and a newly developed sensor with a wire and four rounded corners. 60 patients participated in the study. The five receptors [a Kodak paper pack film (Eastman Kodak Company, Rochester, NY), a DIGORA (R) Optime phosphor plate (Soredex, Tuusula, Finland), and SuniRay (Suni Medical Imaging, Inc., San Jose, CA), DIGORA Toto (Soredex) and Snapshot (Instrumentarium Dental, Tuusula, Finland) complementary metal-oxide-semiconductors] with differences in ergonomic shape were placed in the mouth for a bitewing examination for approximately 10 s. The patients rated their discomfort on a 100 mm visual analogue scale after having had each receptor positioned. There was no significant difference in patient discomfort score between the conventional film and the Snapshot sensor (p>0.05). Both conventional film and Snapshot were significantly less uncomfortable than the other receptors (p<0.05). No significant difference was seen between the storage phosphor plate and the SuniRay sensor (p>0.05). The storage phosphor plate was significantly less uncomfortable than the DIGORA Toto sensor (p<0.05). There was no significant difference in the perception of discomfort between the conventional film and an ergonomically shaped wired sensor with rounded corners. Dentomaxillofacial Radiology (2012) 41, 323-327. doi: 10.1259/dmfr/73402308

    Cate of OECD: Clinical medicine

    Year of Publication: 2012

    Business Area: other

    Detail Business: medicine & science

    Country: England

    Study Area: contents, digital, patient

    Name of Journal: DENTOMAXILLOFACIAL RADIOLOGY

    Language: English

    Country of Authors: [Jorgensen, P. M.; Wenzel, A.] Aarhus Univ, Dept Dent, DK-8000 Aarhus, Denmark

    Press Adress: Jorgensen, PM (reprint author), Aarhus Univ, Dept Dent, Vennelyst Blvd 9, DK-8000 Aarhus, Denmark.

    Email Address: pernillemjoergensen@hotmail.com

    Citaion:

    Funding:

    Lists of Citation: Bahrami G, 2003, DENTOMAXILLOFAC RAD, V32, P317, DOI 10.1259/dmfr/14212871; Bentsen B, 2001, EUR J PAIN-LONDON, V5, P373, DOI 10.1053/eujp.2001.0256; Christiansen R, 2008, ORAL SURG ORAL MED O, V105, P245, DOI 10.1016/j.tripleo.2007.08.023; Goncalves A, 2009, DENTOMAXILLOFAC RAD, V38, P484, DOI 10.1259/dmfr/82025587; Hellen-Halme K, 2004, SWED DENT J, V28, P77; Lara-Munoz C, 2004, ARCH MED RES, V35, P43, DOI 10.1016/j.arcmed.2003.07.007; Matzen LH, 2009, ORAL SURG ORAL MED O, V107, P566, DOI 10.1016/j.tripleo.2008.10.002; Price DD, 1987, CLIN J PAIN, V3, P3; PRICE DD, 1983, PAIN, V17, P45, DOI 10.1016/0304-3959(83)90126-4; Quiton RL, 2008, PAIN, V137, P245, DOI 10.1016/j.pain.2007.08.034; Ram D, 2010, QUINTESSENCE INT, V41, P673; Sommers TM, 2002, DENT HYG, V76, P26; Wenzel A, 2010, ACTA ODONTOL SCAND, V68, P106, DOI 10.3109/00016350903514426

    Number of Citaion: 13

    Publication: BRITISH INST RADIOLOGY

    City of Publication: LONDON

    Address of Publication: 36 PORTLAND PLACE, LONDON W1N 4AT, ENGLAND

    ISSN: 0250-832X

    29-Character Source Abbreviation: DENTOMAXILLOFAC RAD

    ISO Source Abbreviation: Dentomaxillofac. Radiol.

    Volume: 41

    Version: 4

    Start of File: 323

    End of File: 327

    DOI: 10.1259/dmfr/73402308

    Number of Pages: 5

    Web of Science Category: Dentistry, Oral Surgery & Medicine; Radiology, Nuclear Medicine & Medical Imaging

    Subject Category: Dentistry, Oral Surgery & Medicine; Radiology, Nuclear Medicine & Medical Imaging

    Document Delivery Number: 941PV

    Unique Article Identifier: WOS:000303976000009

    [ÀÌ °Ô½Ã¹°Àº HyeJung Mo¡¦´Ô¿¡ ÀÇÇØ 2015-05-20 20:21:01 GAMBLING¿¡¼­ À̵¿ µÊ]
    reply : 0
  • list
  • prev
  • next