마케팅·홍보 | Cases and Studies of Marketing and Promotion in Lottery & Gambling | 市场销售 & 宣传
- date : 2015-05-20 01:10|hit : 2634
-
- Article] ETHYLENE RESPONSE 1 histidine kinase activity of Arabidopsis promotes plant growth
-
DocNo of ILP: 4400
Doc. Type: Article
Title: ETHYLENE RESPONSE 1 histidine kinase activity of Arabidopsis promotes plant growth
Authors: Cho, YH; Yoo, SD
Full Name of Authors: Cho, Young-Hee; Yoo, Sang-Dong
Keywords by Author:
Keywords Plus: ETHYLENE RECEPTOR ETR1; CYTOKININ SIGNAL-TRANSDUCTION; ENDOPLASMIC-RETICULUM; GENE FAMILY; DOMAIN; INSENSITIVITY; LOCALIZATION; REGULATORS; MUTATIONS; FORMS
Abstract: ETHYLENE RESPONSE 1 (ETR1) is one of five receptors for the plant hormone ethylene (Bleecker et al., 1988; Chang et al., 1993; for review, see Bleecker and Kende, 2000; Schaller and Kieber, 2002). ETR1 contains both an N-terminal ligand-binding hydrophobic domain and light signaling-implicated GAF domain (Fig. 1A; Chang et al., 1993). ETR1 also has a C-terminal His kinase (HK) domain fused with a response regulator motif. Biochemical analyses have demonstrated functional HK activity (Gamble et al., 1998, 2002; Moussatche and Klee, 2004). Within the HK domain, both the catalytic G1 and ATP-binding G2 domains are required for the autophosphorylation of ETR1 at His-353. Protein-protein interaction between ETR1 and any of three Arabidopsis (Arabidopsis thaliana) His phosphotransfer proteins suggests that ETR1 HK activity may modulate Arabidopsis response regulators (ARRs) through two-component phosphor-relay system (Urao et al., 2000). Indeed, ETR1-dependent phosphorylation of the B-type ARR2 activates ethylene response transcription (Hass et al., 2004). Nevertheless, signaling through ARRs modulates ethylene signaling marginally, because combinations of B-type arr mutants are still sensitive to ethylene (Mason et al., 2005). Furthermore, ETR1 with inactive HK provides wild-type ethylene responsiveness in single etr1 or double etr1 ers1 null mutants (Gamble et al., 2002; Wang et al., 2003). Thus far, the biological function or an in vivo signaling mechanism for ETR1 HK activity remains unknown. Only recently, the HK activity was shown to be important in the rate of growth recovery after ethylene removal (Binder et al., 2004). Otherwise, its role in ethylene or any other plant signaling is unclear.
Cate of OECD: Biological sciences
Year of Publication: 2007
Business Area: gamble
Detail Business: gamble
Country: USA
Study Area:
Name of Journal: PLANT PHYSIOLOGY
Language: English
Country of Authors: Harvard Univ, Sch Med, Dept Genet, Massachusetts Gen Hosp,Dept Mol Biol, Boston, MA 02114 USA
Press Adress: Yoo, SD (reprint author), Harvard Univ, Sch Med, Dept Genet, Massachusetts Gen Hosp,Dept Mol Biol, Boston, MA 02114 USA.
Email Address: yoo@molbio.mgh.harvard.edu
Citaion:
Funding:
Lists of Citation: Alonso JM, 2003, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V100, P2992, DOI 10.1073/pnas.0438070100; Binder BM, 2004, PLANT PHYSIOL, V136, P2913, DOI 10.1104/pp.104.050369; Bleecker AB, 2000, ANNU REV CELL DEV BI, V16, P1, DOI 10.1146/annurev.cellbio.16.1.1; Cancel JD, 2002, PLANT PHYSIOL, V129, P1557, DOI 10.1104/pp.003780; CHANG C, 1993, SCIENCE, V262, P539, DOI 10.1126/science.8211181; Chen YF, 2002, J BIOL CHEM, V277, P19861, DOI 10.1074/jbc.M201286200; D'Agostino IB, 2000, PLANT PHYSIOL, V124, P1706, DOI 10.1104/pp.124.4.1706; Gamble RL, 2002, PLANT PHYSIOL, V128, P1428, DOI 10.1104/pp.010777; Gamble RL, 1998, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V95, P7825, DOI 10.1073/pnas.95.13.7825; Gao ZY, 2003, J BIOL CHEM, V278, P34725, DOI 10.1074/jbc.M305548200; Hall AE, 1999, PLANT PHYSIOL, V121, P291, DOI 10.1104/pp.121.1.291; Hass C, 2004, EMBO J, V23, P3290, DOI 10.1038/sj.emboj.7600337; Hua J, 1998, CELL, V94, P261, DOI 10.1016/S0092-8674(00)81425-7; Hwang I, 2001, NATURE, V413, P383, DOI 10.1038/35096500; Hwang Ildoo, 2002, Plant Physiology (Rockville), V129, P500, DOI 10.1104/pp.005504; Mason MG, 2005, PLANT CELL, V17, P3007, DOI 10.1105/tpc.105.035451; Moussatche P, 2004, J BIOL CHEM, V279, P48734, DOI 10.1074/jbc.M403100200; Qu X, 2004, PLANT PHYSIOL, V136, P2961, DOI 10.1104/pp.104.047126; Resnick JS, 2006, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V103, P7917, DOI 10.1073/pnas.0602239103; Rodriguez FI, 1999, SCIENCE, V283, P996, DOI 10.1126/science.283.5404.996; SCHALLER GE, 2002, AM SOC PLANT BIOL; SCHALLER GE, 1995, J BIOL CHEM, V270, P12526; Solano R, 1998, GENE DEV, V12, P3703, DOI 10.1101/gad.12.23.3703; Urao T, 2000, FEBS LETT, V478, P227, DOI 10.1016/S0014-5793(00)01860-3; Wang WY, 2003, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V100, P352, DOI 10.1073/pnas.0237085100; Yanagisawa S, 2003, NATURE, V425, P521, DOI 10.1038/nature01984; Zhao XC, 2002, PLANT PHYSIOL, V130, P1983, DOI 10.1104/pp.011635
Number of Citaion: 27
Publication: AMER SOC PLANT BIOLOGISTS
City of Publication: ROCKVILLE
Address of Publication: 15501 MONONA DRIVE, ROCKVILLE, MD 20855 USA
ISSN: 0032-0889
29-Character Source Abbreviation: PLANT PHYSIOL
ISO Source Abbreviation: Plant Physiol.
Volume: 143
Version: 2
Start of File: 612
End of File: 616
DOI: 10.1104/pp.106.091504
Number of Pages: 5
Web of Science Category: Plant Sciences
Subject Category: Plant Sciences
Document Delivery Number: 133SB
Unique Article Identifier: WOS:000244032400007
[이 게시물은 HyeJung Mo…님에 의해 2015-05-20 20:12:52 GAMBLING에서 이동 됨]
- reply : 0
-
- list
-
- prev
- next